GHSA-Q76P-322H-XPR7

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 17:01 – Updated: 2024-04-04 02:40
VLAI?
Details

In Lexmark Services Monitor 2.27.4.0.39 (running on TCP port 2070), a remote attacker can use a directory traversal technique using /../../../ or ..%2F..%2F..%2F to obtain local files on the host operating system.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2019-16758"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-22"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2019-11-21T18:15:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "In Lexmark Services Monitor 2.27.4.0.39 (running on TCP port 2070), a remote attacker can use a directory traversal technique using /../../../ or ..%2F..%2F..%2F to obtain local files on the host operating system.",
  "id": "GHSA-q76p-322h-xpr7",
  "modified": "2024-04-04T02:40:17Z",
  "published": "2022-05-24T17:01:41Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-16758"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.lexmark.com/en_us.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.symantec.com/security-center/vulnerabilities/writeup/110943"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/155365/Lexmark-Services-Monitor-2.27.4.0.39-Directory-Traversal.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2019/Nov/17"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://support.lexmark.com/index?page=content\u0026id=TE930\u0026locale=en\u0026userlocale=EN_US"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…