GHSA-Q29J-2QWC-GPRJ
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-01 23:47 – Updated: 2022-05-01 23:47Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in WGate in SAP Internet Transaction Server (ITS) 6.20 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via (1) a "<>" sequence in the ~service parameter to wgate.dll, or (2) Javascript splicing in the query string, a different vector than CVE-2006-5114.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2008-2123"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-79"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2008-05-09T18:20:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in WGate in SAP Internet Transaction Server (ITS) 6.20 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via (1) a \"\u003c\u003e\" sequence in the ~service parameter to wgate.dll, or (2) Javascript splicing in the query string, a different vector than CVE-2006-5114.",
"id": "GHSA-q29j-2qwc-gprj",
"modified": "2022-05-01T23:47:01Z",
"published": "2022-05-01T23:47:01Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2008-2123"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/42281"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/30128"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.portcullis-security.com/275.php"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/29103"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1019998"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2008/1466/references"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
Loading timeline…
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.