GHSA-PGP8-CV9P-R5M2

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-04-29 01:27 – Updated: 2022-04-29 01:27
VLAI?
Details

lsh daemon (lshd) does not properly return from certain functions in (1) read_line.c, (2) channel_commands.c, or (3) client_keyexchange.c when long input is provided, which could allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a heap-based buffer overflow attack.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2003-0826"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2003-10-06T04:00:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "lsh daemon (lshd) does not properly return from certain functions in (1) read_line.c, (2) channel_commands.c, or (3) client_keyexchange.c when long input is provided, which could allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a heap-based buffer overflow attack.",
  "id": "GHSA-pgp8-cv9p-r5m2",
  "modified": "2022-04-29T01:27:03Z",
  "published": "2022-04-29T01:27:03Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2003-0826"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://bugs.debian.org/211662"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/2003-September/010496.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://lists.lysator.liu.se/pipermail/lsh-bugs/2003q3/000120.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq\u0026m=106398939512178\u0026w=2"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq\u0026m=106407188509874\u0026w=2"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2005/dsa-717"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…