GHSA-PGP8-CV9P-R5M2
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-04-29 01:27 – Updated: 2022-04-29 01:27
VLAI?
Details
lsh daemon (lshd) does not properly return from certain functions in (1) read_line.c, (2) channel_commands.c, or (3) client_keyexchange.c when long input is provided, which could allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a heap-based buffer overflow attack.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2003-0826"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2003-10-06T04:00:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "lsh daemon (lshd) does not properly return from certain functions in (1) read_line.c, (2) channel_commands.c, or (3) client_keyexchange.c when long input is provided, which could allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a heap-based buffer overflow attack.",
"id": "GHSA-pgp8-cv9p-r5m2",
"modified": "2022-04-29T01:27:03Z",
"published": "2022-04-29T01:27:03Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2003-0826"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://bugs.debian.org/211662"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/2003-September/010496.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://lists.lysator.liu.se/pipermail/lsh-bugs/2003q3/000120.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq\u0026m=106398939512178\u0026w=2"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq\u0026m=106407188509874\u0026w=2"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2005/dsa-717"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…