GHSA-P9J3-Q86P-M6QQ

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-04-22 15:31 – Updated: 2026-04-22 15:31
VLAI?
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

RDMA/irdma: Harden depth calculation functions

An issue was exposed where OS can pass in U32_MAX for SQ/RQ/SRQ size. This can cause integer overflow and truncation of SQ/RQ/SRQ depth returning a success when it should have failed.

Harden the functions to do all depth calculations and boundary checking in u64 sizes.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-31491"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-04-22T14:16:46Z",
    "severity": null
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nRDMA/irdma: Harden depth calculation functions\n\nAn issue was exposed where OS can pass in U32_MAX for SQ/RQ/SRQ size.\nThis can cause integer overflow and truncation of SQ/RQ/SRQ depth\nreturning a success when it should have failed.\n\nHarden the functions to do all depth calculations and boundary\nchecking in u64 sizes.",
  "id": "GHSA-p9j3-q86p-m6qq",
  "modified": "2026-04-22T15:31:42Z",
  "published": "2026-04-22T15:31:42Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-31491"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3f08351de5ca4f2f724b86ad252fbc21289467e1"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/cbd852f5700eb3f64392452faf693ac45cae8281"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e37afcb56ae070477741fe2d6e61fc0c542cce2d"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…