GHSA-P5QJ-W5WR-J75H
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-14 02:38 – Updated: 2022-05-14 02:38
VLAI?
Details
Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Collabtive 0.4.8 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) submit or edit a new project, or (2) upload files to a project, or (3) attach files to messages via unknown vectors. NOTE: these issues can be leveraged with other vulnerabilities to create remote attack vectors that do not require authentication.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2008-6949"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2009-08-12T10:30:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Collabtive 0.4.8 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) submit or edit a new project, or (2) upload files to a project, or (3) attach files to messages via unknown vectors. NOTE: these issues can be leveraged with other vulnerabilities to create remote attack vectors that do not require authentication.",
"id": "GHSA-p5qj-w5wr-j75h",
"modified": "2022-05-14T02:38:11Z",
"published": "2022-05-14T02:38:11Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2008-6949"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/7076"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/498186/100/0/threaded"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…