GHSA-P5G4-V748-6FH8

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-04-07 16:46 – Updated: 2025-04-07 16:46
VLAI?
Summary
tarteaucitron.js allows url scheme injection via unfiltered inputs
Details

A vulnerability was identified in tarteaucitron.js, allowing a user with high privileges (access to the site's source code or a CMS plugin) to enter a URL containing an insecure scheme such as javascript:alert(). Before the fix, URL validation was insufficient, which could allow arbitrary JavaScript execution if a user clicked on a malicious link.

Impact

An attacker with high privileges could insert a link exploiting an insecure URL scheme, leading to: - Execution of arbitrary JavaScript code - Theft of sensitive data through phishing attacks - Modification of the user interface behavior

Fix https://github.com/AmauriC/tarteaucitron.js/commit/2fa1e01023bce2e4b813200600bb1619d56ceb02

The issue was resolved by enforcing strict URL validation, ensuring that they start with http:// or https:// before being used.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "npm",
        "name": "tarteaucitronjs"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "1.20.1"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-31476"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-79"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2025-04-07T16:46:57Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-04-07T15:15:44Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "A vulnerability was identified in `tarteaucitron.js`, allowing a user with high privileges (access to the site\u0027s source code or a CMS plugin) to enter a URL containing an insecure scheme such as `javascript:alert()`. Before the fix, URL validation was insufficient, which could allow arbitrary JavaScript execution if a user clicked on a malicious link.\n\n## Impact\nAn attacker with high privileges could insert a link exploiting an insecure URL scheme, leading to:\n- Execution of arbitrary JavaScript code\n- Theft of sensitive data through phishing attacks\n- Modification of the user interface behavior\n\n## Fix https://github.com/AmauriC/tarteaucitron.js/commit/2fa1e01023bce2e4b813200600bb1619d56ceb02\nThe issue was resolved by enforcing strict URL validation, ensuring that they start with `http://` or `https://` before being used.",
  "id": "GHSA-p5g4-v748-6fh8",
  "modified": "2025-04-07T16:46:57Z",
  "published": "2025-04-07T16:46:57Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/AmauriC/tarteaucitron.js/security/advisories/GHSA-p5g4-v748-6fh8"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-31476"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/AmauriC/tarteaucitron.js/commit/2fa1e01023bce2e4b813200600bb1619d56ceb02"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/AmauriC/tarteaucitron.js"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "tarteaucitron.js allows url scheme injection via unfiltered inputs"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…