GHSA-P4PM-X7CH-5MVC

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-04-24 15:32 – Updated: 2026-04-24 15:32
VLAI?
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

rxrpc: Fix RxGK token loading to check bounds

rxrpc_preparse_xdr_yfs_rxgk() reads the raw key length and ticket length from the XDR token as u32 values and passes each through round_up(x, 4) before using the rounded value for validation and allocation. When the raw length is >= 0xfffffffd, round_up() wraps to 0, so the bounds check and kzalloc both use 0 while the subsequent memcpy still copies the original ~4 GiB value, producing a heap buffer overflow reachable from an unprivileged add_key() call.

Fix this by:

(1) Rejecting raw key lengths above AFSTOKEN_GK_KEY_MAX and raw ticket lengths above AFSTOKEN_GK_TOKEN_MAX before rounding, consistent with the caps that the RxKAD path already enforces via AFSTOKEN_RK_TIX_MAX.

(2) Sizing the flexible-array allocation from the validated raw key length via struct_size_t() instead of the rounded value.

(3) Caching the raw lengths so that the later field assignments and memcpy calls do not re-read from the token, eliminating a class of TOCTOU re-parse.

The control path (valid token with lengths within bounds) is unaffected.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-31641"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-04-24T15:16:43Z",
    "severity": null
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nrxrpc: Fix RxGK token loading to check bounds\n\nrxrpc_preparse_xdr_yfs_rxgk() reads the raw key length and ticket length\nfrom the XDR token as u32 values and passes each through round_up(x, 4)\nbefore using the rounded value for validation and allocation.  When the raw\nlength is \u003e= 0xfffffffd, round_up() wraps to 0, so the bounds check and\nkzalloc both use 0 while the subsequent memcpy still copies the original\n~4 GiB value, producing a heap buffer overflow reachable from an\nunprivileged add_key() call.\n\nFix this by:\n\n (1) Rejecting raw key lengths above AFSTOKEN_GK_KEY_MAX and raw ticket\n     lengths above AFSTOKEN_GK_TOKEN_MAX before rounding, consistent with\n     the caps that the RxKAD path already enforces via AFSTOKEN_RK_TIX_MAX.\n\n (2) Sizing the flexible-array allocation from the validated raw key\n     length via struct_size_t() instead of the rounded value.\n\n (3) Caching the raw lengths so that the later field assignments and\n     memcpy calls do not re-read from the token, eliminating a class of\n     TOCTOU re-parse.\n\nThe control path (valid token with lengths within bounds) is unaffected.",
  "id": "GHSA-p4pm-x7ch-5mvc",
  "modified": "2026-04-24T15:32:36Z",
  "published": "2026-04-24T15:32:36Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-31641"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3e04596cba8a86cbff9c3f4bf0a524a3a488773c"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/49875b360c2b83a3c226e189c502e501d83e6445"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d179a868dd755b0cfcf7582e00943d702b9943b8"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…