GHSA-MR8R-92FQ-PJ8P
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-04-23 21:40 – Updated: 2026-04-23 21:40Summary
When exporting telemetry over gRPC using the OpenTelemetry Protocol (OTLP), the exporter may parse a server-provided grpc-status-details-bin trailer during retry handling. Prior to the fix, a malformed trailer could encode an extremely large length-delimited protobuf field which was used directly for allocation, allowing excessive memory allocation and potential denial of service (DoS).
Details
5980 introduced a retry path that parses grpc-status-details-bin to extract gRPC retry delay information for retryable responses.
On that path:
OtlpGrpcExportClientcapturesgrpc-status-details-binfrom retryable status responses (ResourceExhausted/Unavailable).OtlpRetryinvokesGrpcStatusDeserializer.TryGetGrpcRetryDelayusing this untrusted trailer value.GrpcStatusDeserializer.DecodeBytesdecoded a protobuf varint length and allocatednew byte[length]without validating the bounds against the remaining payload size.
A malicious or compromised collector (or a MitM in weakly-protected deployments) could return a crafted grpc-status-details-bin payload that forces oversized allocation and memory exhaustion in the instrumented process.
Impact
If an OTLP/gRPC endpoint is attacker-controlled (or traffic is intercepted), a crafted retryable response can trigger large allocations during trailer parsing, which may exhaust memory and cause process instability/crash (availability impact / DoS).
Mitigation
The application's configured back-end/collector endpoint needs to behave maliciously. If the collector/back-end is a well-behaved implementation response bodies should not be excessively large if a request error occurs.
Workarounds
None known.
Remediation
#7064 updates GrpcStatusDeserializer to validate decoded length-delimited field sizes before allocation by ensuring the requested length is sane and does not exceed the remaining payload.
This causes malformed or truncated grpc-status-details-bin payloads to fail safely instead of attempting unbounded allocation.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "NuGet",
"name": "OpenTelemetry.Exporter.OpenTelemetryProtocol"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "1.13.1"
},
{
"fixed": "1.15.3"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-40891"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-789"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-04-23T21:40:29Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-04-23T18:16:28Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "### Summary\n\nWhen exporting telemetry over gRPC using the OpenTelemetry Protocol (OTLP), the exporter may parse a server-provided `grpc-status-details-bin` trailer during retry handling. Prior to the fix, a malformed trailer could encode an extremely large length-delimited protobuf field which was used directly for allocation, allowing excessive memory allocation and potential denial of service (DoS).\n\n### Details\n\n#5980 introduced a retry path that parses `grpc-status-details-bin` to extract gRPC retry delay information for retryable responses.\n\nOn that path:\n\n- `OtlpGrpcExportClient` captures `grpc-status-details-bin` from retryable status responses (`ResourceExhausted` / `Unavailable`).\n- `OtlpRetry` invokes `GrpcStatusDeserializer.TryGetGrpcRetryDelay` using this untrusted trailer value.\n- `GrpcStatusDeserializer.DecodeBytes` decoded a protobuf varint length and allocated `new byte[length]` without validating the bounds against the remaining payload size.\n\nA malicious or compromised collector (or a MitM in weakly-protected deployments) could return a crafted `grpc-status-details-bin` payload that forces oversized allocation and memory exhaustion in the instrumented process.\n\n### Impact\n\nIf an OTLP/gRPC endpoint is attacker-controlled (or traffic is intercepted), a crafted retryable response can trigger large allocations during trailer parsing, which may exhaust memory and cause process instability/crash (availability impact / DoS).\n\n### Mitigation\n\nThe application\u0027s configured back-end/collector endpoint needs to behave maliciously. If the collector/back-end is a well-behaved implementation response bodies should not be excessively large if a request error occurs.\n\n### Workarounds\n\nNone known.\n\n### Remediation\n\n[#7064](https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-dotnet/pull/7064) updates `GrpcStatusDeserializer` to validate decoded length-delimited field sizes before allocation by ensuring the requested length is sane and does not exceed the remaining payload.\n\nThis causes malformed or truncated `grpc-status-details-bin` payloads to fail safely instead of attempting unbounded allocation.",
"id": "GHSA-mr8r-92fq-pj8p",
"modified": "2026-04-23T21:40:29Z",
"published": "2026-04-23T21:40:29Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-dotnet/security/advisories/GHSA-mr8r-92fq-pj8p"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-40891"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-dotnet/pull/5980"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-dotnet/pull/7064"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-dotnet"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "OpenTelemetry dotnet: Unbounded `grpc-status-details-bin` parsing in OTLP/gRPC retry handling"
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.