GHSA-MQJM-RHM6-4854

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-04-03 18:31 – Updated: 2026-04-23 21:31
VLAI?
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

net: usb: aqc111: Do not perform PM inside suspend callback

syzbot reports "task hung in rpm_resume"

This is caused by aqc111_suspend calling the PM variant of its write_cmd routine.

The simplified call trace looks like this:

rpm_suspend() usb_suspend_both() - here udev->dev.power.runtime_status == RPM_SUSPENDING aqc111_suspend() - called for the usb device interface aqc111_write32_cmd() usb_autopm_get_interface() pm_runtime_resume_and_get() rpm_resume() - here we call rpm_resume() on our parent rpm_resume() - Here we wait for a status change that will never happen.

At this point we block another task which holds rtnl_lock and locks up the whole networking stack.

Fix this by replacing the write_cmd calls with their _nopm variants

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-23446"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-04-03T16:16:30Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnet: usb: aqc111: Do not perform PM inside suspend callback\n\nsyzbot reports \"task hung in rpm_resume\"\n\nThis is caused by aqc111_suspend calling\nthe PM variant of its write_cmd routine.\n\nThe simplified call trace looks like this:\n\nrpm_suspend()\n  usb_suspend_both() - here udev-\u003edev.power.runtime_status == RPM_SUSPENDING\n    aqc111_suspend() - called for the usb device interface\n      aqc111_write32_cmd()\n        usb_autopm_get_interface()\n          pm_runtime_resume_and_get()\n            rpm_resume() - here we call rpm_resume() on our parent\n              rpm_resume() - Here we wait for a status change that will never happen.\n\nAt this point we block another task which holds\nrtnl_lock and locks up the whole networking stack.\n\nFix this by replacing the write_cmd calls with their _nopm variants",
  "id": "GHSA-mqjm-rhm6-4854",
  "modified": "2026-04-23T21:31:18Z",
  "published": "2026-04-03T18:31:21Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-23446"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/069c8f5aebe4d5224cf62acc7d4b3486091c658a"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3267bcb744ee8a2feabaa7ab69473f086f67fd71"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4de6a43e8ecf961feabddf0e9d6911081d2ed218"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/621f2f43741b51f62d767eb4752fbcefe2526926"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/98e8aed64614b0c199d5f0391fbe1a4331cb5773"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b87f361d41f9a7f1f6c426947ca815651c481376"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/cc06ac99fd78839b2d38850785731ef131d9ae26"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d3e32a612c6391ca9b7c183aeec22b4fd24c300c"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…