GHSA-MPF7-M9X4-8PXW

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 02:25 – Updated: 2022-05-17 02:25
VLAI?
Details

Microsec e-Szigno before 3.2.7.12 allows remote attackers to perform XML signature wrapping attacks via an e-akta signed document with a ds:Object node with a crafted payload prepended to a valid ds:Object.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2015-3931"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-91"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2017-07-21T14:29:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Microsec e-Szigno before 3.2.7.12 allows remote attackers to perform XML signature wrapping attacks via an e-akta signed document with a ds:Object node with a crafted payload prepended to a valid ds:Object.",
  "id": "GHSA-mpf7-m9x4-8pxw",
  "modified": "2022-05-17T02:25:46Z",
  "published": "2022-05-17T02:25:46Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2015-3931"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://e-szigno.hu/letoltesek/programok-driverek.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.search-lab.hu/about-us/news/107-37-million-digitally-signed-documents-had-to-be-reverified"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.search-lab.hu/eakta"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/132473/Microsec-e-Szigno-Netlock-Mokka-XML-Signature-Wrapping.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.neih.gov.hu/?q=node/66"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/75487"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…