GHSA-MJHW-6JQV-4G9F
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-01 06:48 – Updated: 2022-05-01 06:48
VLAI?
Details
PasswordSafe 3.0 beta, when running on Windows before XP, uses a weak random number generator (C++ rand function) during generation of the database encryption key, which makes it easier for attackers to decrypt the database and steal passwords by generating keys for all possible rand() seed values and conducting a known plaintext attack.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2006-1378"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2006-03-24T02:02:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "PasswordSafe 3.0 beta, when running on Windows before XP, uses a weak random number generator (C++ rand function) during generation of the database encryption key, which makes it easier for attackers to decrypt the database and steal passwords by generating keys for all possible rand() seed values and conducting a known plaintext attack.",
"id": "GHSA-mjhw-6jqv-4g9f",
"modified": "2022-05-01T06:48:50Z",
"published": "2022-05-01T06:48:50Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2006-1378"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/25429"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://securityreason.com/securityalert/618"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/428552/100/0/threaded"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/445509/100/0/threaded"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/17200"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…