GHSA-MJ5R-HH7J-4GXF
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-02-18 00:54 – Updated: 2026-03-06 01:03Summary
Telegram allowlist authorization could match on @username (mutable/recyclable) instead of immutable numeric sender IDs.
Impact
Operators who treat Telegram allowlists as strict identity controls could unintentionally grant access if a username changes hands (identity rebinding/spoof risk). This can allow an unauthorized sender to interact with the bot in allowlist mode.
Affected Packages / Versions
- npm
openclaw: <= 2026.2.13 - npm
clawdbot: <= 2026.1.24-3
Fix
Telegram allowlist authorization now requires numeric Telegram sender IDs only. @username allowlist principals are rejected.
A security audit warning was added to flag legacy configs that still contain non-numeric Telegram allowlist entries.
openclaw doctor --fix now attempts to resolve @username allowFrom entries to numeric IDs (best-effort; requires a Telegram bot token).
Fix Commit(s)
- e3b432e481a96b8fd41b91273818e514074e05c3
- 9e147f00b48e63e7be6964e0e2a97f2980854128
Thanks @vincentkoc for reporting.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "openclaw"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "2026.2.14"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "clawdbot"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"last_affected": "2026.1.24-3"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-28480"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-284",
"CWE-290"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-02-18T00:54:32Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-03-05T22:16:22Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "## Summary\nTelegram allowlist authorization could match on `@username` (mutable/recyclable) instead of immutable numeric sender IDs.\n\n## Impact\nOperators who treat Telegram allowlists as strict identity controls could unintentionally grant access if a username changes hands (identity rebinding/spoof risk). This can allow an unauthorized sender to interact with the bot in allowlist mode.\n\n## Affected Packages / Versions\n- npm `openclaw`: \u003c= 2026.2.13\n- npm `clawdbot`: \u003c= 2026.1.24-3\n\n## Fix\nTelegram allowlist authorization now requires numeric Telegram sender IDs only. `@username` allowlist principals are rejected.\n\nA security audit warning was added to flag legacy configs that still contain non-numeric Telegram allowlist entries.\n\n`openclaw doctor --fix` now attempts to resolve `@username` allowFrom entries to numeric IDs (best-effort; requires a Telegram bot token).\n\n## Fix Commit(s)\n- e3b432e481a96b8fd41b91273818e514074e05c3\n- 9e147f00b48e63e7be6964e0e2a97f2980854128\n\nThanks @vincentkoc for reporting.",
"id": "GHSA-mj5r-hh7j-4gxf",
"modified": "2026-03-06T01:03:30Z",
"published": "2026-02-18T00:54:32Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/security/advisories/GHSA-mj5r-hh7j-4gxf"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-28480"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/commit/9e147f00b48e63e7be6964e0e2a97f2980854128"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/commit/e3b432e481a96b8fd41b91273818e514074e05c3"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/releases/tag/v2026.2.14"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/openclaw-identity-spoofing-via-mutable-username-in-telegram-allowlist-authorization"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
],
"summary": "OpenClaw Telegram allowlist authorization accepted mutable usernames"
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.