GHSA-MJ32-R678-7MVP

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-03-10 18:24 – Updated: 2026-03-10 22:55
VLAI
Summary
Craft Commerce has stored XSS in Craft Commerce Order Details Slideout
Details

Summary

A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the Craft Commerce Order details. Malicious JavaScript can be injected via the Shipping Method Name, Order Reference, or Site Name. When a user opens the order details slideout via a double-click on the order index page, the injected payload executes.

Reproduction Steps

  1. Navigate to Commerce -> Store Management -> Shipping Methods.
  2. Click "New Shipping Method".
  3. In the Name field, enter the following XSS payload: html <img src=x onerror=alert('XSS_Shipping')>
  4. Save the Shipping Method.
  5. Place a new order or edit an existing order.
  6. Set the order's Shipping Method to the one created in the previous steps.
  7. Navigate to the Orders index page (/admin/commerce/orders).
  8. Double-click the target order to open the details slideout.
  9. Result: The XSS payload executes.
Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "database_specific": {
        "last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 4.10.1"
      },
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Packagist",
        "name": "craftcms/commerce"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "4.0.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "4.10.2"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "database_specific": {
        "last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 5.5.2"
      },
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Packagist",
        "name": "craftcms/commerce"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "5.0.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "5.5.3"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-29177"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-79"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-03-10T18:24:18Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-03-10T20:16:39Z",
    "severity": "LOW"
  },
  "details": "## Summary\nA Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the Craft Commerce Order details. Malicious JavaScript can be injected via the **Shipping Method Name**, **Order Reference**, or **Site Name**. When a user opens the order details slideout via a double-click on the order index page, the injected payload executes.\n\n## Reproduction Steps\n1. Navigate to **Commerce** -\u003e **Store Management** -\u003e **Shipping Methods**.\n1. Click \"New Shipping Method\".\n1. In the **Name** field, enter the following XSS payload:\n    ```html\n    \u003cimg src=x onerror=alert(\u0027XSS_Shipping\u0027)\u003e\n    ```\n1. Save the Shipping Method.\n1. Place a new order or edit an existing order.\n1. Set the order\u0027s **Shipping Method** to the one created in the previous steps.\n1. Navigate to the **Orders** index page (`/admin/commerce/orders`).\n1. Double-click the target order to open the details slideout.\n1. **Result**: The XSS payload executes.",
  "id": "GHSA-mj32-r678-7mvp",
  "modified": "2026-03-10T22:55:02Z",
  "published": "2026-03-10T18:24:18Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/craftcms/commerce/security/advisories/GHSA-mj32-r678-7mvp"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-29177"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/craftcms/commerce/commit/b0683e04773f16bba6af9df18aab495fc5dde68a"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/craftcms/commerce"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Craft Commerce has stored XSS in Craft Commerce Order Details Slideout"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline

Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC

JSON
How durations are calculated

Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.

Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.

Events included in the timeline

Loading timeline…


    Loading…

    Loading…

    Loading…

    Related by attack behaviour

    Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.