GHSA-MH23-RW7F-V5PQ
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-03-05 21:15 – Updated: 2026-03-05 21:15
VLAI?
Summary
`time-sync` was removed from crates.io due to malicious code
Details
The time-sync crate attempted to exfiltrate .env files to a server that was in turn impersonating the legitimate timeapi.io service. This the same attack that we've seen three times in the last few days.
The malicious crate had 1 version published on 2026-03-04 approximately 50 minutes before removal and had no evidence of actual downloads. There were no crates depending on this crate on crates.io.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "crates.io",
"name": "time-sync"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-03-05T21:15:45Z",
"nvd_published_at": null,
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "The `time-sync` crate attempted to exfiltrate `.env` files to a server that was in turn impersonating the legitimate `timeapi.io` service. This the same attack that we\u0027ve seen three times in the last few days.\n\nThe malicious crate had 1 version published on 2026-03-04 approximately 50 minutes before removal and had no evidence of actual downloads. There were no crates depending on this crate on crates.io.",
"id": "GHSA-mh23-rw7f-v5pq",
"modified": "2026-03-05T21:15:45Z",
"published": "2026-03-05T21:15:45Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0036.html"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [],
"summary": "`time-sync` was removed from crates.io due to malicious code"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…