GHSA-M9M5-CG5H-R582
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2021-08-25 20:50 – Updated: 2023-06-13 20:01
VLAI?
Summary
Improper random number generation in nanorand
Details
In versions of nanorand prior to 0.5.1, RandomGen implementations for standard unsigned integers could fail to properly generate numbers, due to using bit-shifting to truncate a 64-bit number, rather than just an as conversion. This often manifested as RNGs returning nothing but 0, including the cryptographically secure ChaCha random number generator.
Severity ?
5.1 (Medium)
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "crates.io",
"name": "nanorand"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "0.5.1"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2020-35926"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-338"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2021-08-19T18:55:41Z",
"nvd_published_at": null,
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "In versions of nanorand prior to 0.5.1, RandomGen implementations for standard unsigned integers could fail to properly generate numbers, due to using bit-shifting to truncate a 64-bit number, rather than just an as conversion. This often manifested as RNGs returning nothing but 0, including the cryptographically secure ChaCha random number generator.",
"id": "GHSA-m9m5-cg5h-r582",
"modified": "2023-06-13T20:01:40Z",
"published": "2021-08-25T20:50:24Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-35926"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/Absolucy/nanorand-rs/commit/5ba218ac29df4786b002d7d12b47fa0c04a331f2"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/Absolucy/nanorand-rs"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2020-0089.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://twitter.com/aspenluxxxy/status/1336684692284772352"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Improper random number generation in nanorand"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…