GHSA-JRF8-CMGG-GV2M

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2021-08-25 20:53 – Updated: 2023-06-13 20:29
VLAI?
Summary
Error on unsupported architectures in raw-cpuid
Details

native_cpuid::cpuid_count() exposes the unsafe __cpuid_count() intrinsic from core::arch::x86 or core::arch::x86_64 as a safe function, and uses it internally, without checking the safety requirement:

  • The CPU the program is currently running on supports the function being called.

CPUID is available in most, but not all, x86/x86_64 environments. The crate compiles only on these architectures, so others are unaffected. This issue is mitigated by the fact that affected programs are expected to crash deterministically every time.

The flaw has been fixed in v9.0.0, by intentionally breaking compilation when targeting SGX or 32-bit x86 without SSE. This covers all affected CPUs.

Severity ?
5.5 (Medium)
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Show details on source website
To clipboard Create KEV Entry 

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "crates.io",
        "name": "raw-cpuid"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "9.0.0"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2021-26307"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-400",
      "CWE-657"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2021-08-19T18:02:32Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2021-01-29T03:15:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "native_cpuid::cpuid_count() exposes the unsafe __cpuid_count() intrinsic from core::arch::x86 or core::arch::x86_64 as a safe function, and uses it internally, without checking the safety requirement:\n\n* The CPU the program is currently running on supports the function being called.\n\nCPUID is available in most, but not all, x86/x86_64 environments. The crate compiles only on these architectures, so others are unaffected. This issue is mitigated by the fact that affected programs are expected to crash deterministically every time.\n\nThe flaw has been fixed in v9.0.0, by intentionally breaking compilation when targeting SGX or 32-bit x86 without SSE. This covers all affected CPUs.",
  "id": "GHSA-jrf8-cmgg-gv2m",
  "modified": "2023-06-13T20:29:54Z",
  "published": "2021-08-25T20:53:07Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-26307"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/gz/rust-cpuid/issues/40"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/gz/rust-cpuid/issues/41"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/RustSec/advisory-db/pull/614"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/gz/rust-cpuid/commit/91b676eecd01f2163e2984215e2c0ac89e30ce75"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/gz/rust-cpuid"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2021-0013.html"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Error on unsupported architectures in raw-cpuid"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.