GHSA-JCGR-9698-82JX
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2021-05-28 15:53 – Updated: 2021-05-27 21:05
VLAI?
Summary
Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command ('Command Injection') in @floffah/build
Details
Impact
If you are using the esbuild target or command you are at risk of code/option injection. Attackers can use the command line option to maliciously change your settings in order to damage your project.
Patches
The problem has been patched in v1.0.0 as it uses a proper method to pass configs to esbuild/estrella.
Workarounds
There is no work around. You should update asap.
Notes
This notice is mainly just to make sure people update to the latest version. This isn't that bad, but should encourage you to update.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "@floffah/build"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "1.0.0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-77"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2021-05-27T21:05:29Z",
"nvd_published_at": null,
"severity": "LOW"
},
"details": "### Impact\nIf you are using the esbuild target or command you are at risk of code/option injection. Attackers can use the command line option to maliciously change your settings in order to damage your project.\n\n### Patches\nThe problem has been patched in v1.0.0 as it uses a proper method to pass configs to esbuild/estrella.\n\n### Workarounds\nThere is no work around. You should update asap.\n\n### Notes\nThis notice is mainly just to make sure people update to the latest version. This isn\u0027t that bad, but should encourage you to update.",
"id": "GHSA-jcgr-9698-82jx",
"modified": "2021-05-27T21:05:29Z",
"published": "2021-05-28T15:53:40Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/Floffah/build/security/advisories/GHSA-jcgr-9698-82jx"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [],
"summary": "Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command (\u0027Command Injection\u0027) in @floffah/build"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…