GHSA-J72W-3754-92GG
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-03-18 12:31 – Updated: 2026-10-15 03:35In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
fs: ntfs3: fix infinite loop triggered by zero-sized ATTR_LIST
We found an infinite loop bug in the ntfs3 file system that can lead to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) condition.
A malformed NTFS image can cause an infinite loop when an ATTR_LIST attribute indicates a zero data size while the driver allocates memory for it.
When ntfs_load_attr_list() processes a resident ATTR_LIST with data_size set to zero, it still allocates memory because of al_aligned(0). This creates an inconsistent state where ni->attr_list.size is zero, but ni->attr_list.le is non-null. This causes ni_enum_attr_ex to incorrectly assume that no attribute list exists and enumerates only the primary MFT record. When it finds ATTR_LIST, the code reloads it and restarts the enumeration, repeating indefinitely. The mount operation never completes, hanging the kernel thread.
This patch adds validation to ensure that data_size is non-zero before memory allocation. When a zero-sized ATTR_LIST is detected, the function returns -EINVAL, preventing a DoS vulnerability.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-71267"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-835"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-03-18T11:16:15Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nfs: ntfs3: fix infinite loop triggered by zero-sized ATTR_LIST\n\nWe found an infinite loop bug in the ntfs3 file system that can lead to a\nDenial-of-Service (DoS) condition.\n\nA malformed NTFS image can cause an infinite loop when an ATTR_LIST attribute\nindicates a zero data size while the driver allocates memory for it.\n\nWhen ntfs_load_attr_list() processes a resident ATTR_LIST with data_size set\nto zero, it still allocates memory because of al_aligned(0). This creates an\ninconsistent state where ni-\u003eattr_list.size is zero, but ni-\u003eattr_list.le is\nnon-null. This causes ni_enum_attr_ex to incorrectly assume that no attribute\nlist exists and enumerates only the primary MFT record. When it finds\nATTR_LIST, the code reloads it and restarts the enumeration, repeating\nindefinitely. The mount operation never completes, hanging the kernel thread.\n\nThis patch adds validation to ensure that data_size is non-zero before memory\nallocation. When a zero-sized ATTR_LIST is detected, the function returns\n-EINVAL, preventing a DoS vulnerability.",
"id": "GHSA-j72w-3754-92gg",
"modified": "2026-10-15T03:35:18Z",
"published": "2026-03-18T12:31:52Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-71267"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-019113.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-082556.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-457936.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/06909b2549d631a47fcda249d34be26f7ca1711d"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7ef219656febf5ae06ae56b1fce47ebd05f92b68"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8d8c70b57dbeda3eb165c0940b97e85373ca9354"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9267d99fade76d44d4a133599524031fe684156e"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/976e6a7c51fabf150478decbe8ef5d9a26039b7c"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9779a6eaaabdf47aa57910d352b398ad742e6a5f"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/fd508939dbca5eceefb2d0c2564beb15469572f2"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
How durations are calculated
Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.
Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.
Loading timeline…
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.