GHSA-HVQC-PC78-X9WH
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2021-08-25 20:53 – Updated: 2023-06-13 20:30
VLAI?
Summary
Soundness issue in raw-cpuid
Details
VendorInfo::as_string(), SoCVendorBrand::as_string(), and ExtendedFunctionInfo::processor_brand_string() construct byte slices using std::slice::from_raw_parts(), with data coming from #[repr(Rust)] structs. This is always undefined behavior. This flaw has been fixed in v9.0.0, by making the relevant structs #[repr(C)].
Severity ?
7.5 (High)
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "crates.io",
"name": "raw-cpuid"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "9.0.0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2021-26306"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-198",
"CWE-400"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2021-08-19T18:02:19Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2021-01-29T03:15:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "VendorInfo::as_string(), SoCVendorBrand::as_string(), and ExtendedFunctionInfo::processor_brand_string() construct byte slices using std::slice::from_raw_parts(), with data coming from #[repr(Rust)] structs. This is always undefined behavior.\nThis flaw has been fixed in v9.0.0, by making the relevant structs #[repr(C)].",
"id": "GHSA-hvqc-pc78-x9wh",
"modified": "2023-06-13T20:30:27Z",
"published": "2021-08-25T20:53:10Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-26306"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/gz/rust-cpuid/issues/40"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/RustSec/advisory-db/pull/614"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/gz/rust-cpuid"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2021-0013.html"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Soundness issue in raw-cpuid"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…