GHSA-HPW3-VHRJ-P6Q9
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-03-19 18:31 – Updated: 2026-03-24 03:31
VLAI?
Details
Use of a hard-coded AES-256-CBC key in the configuration backup/restore implementation of Small Cell Sercomm SCE4255W (FreedomFi Englewood) firmware before DG3934v3@2308041842 allows remote authenticated users to decrypt, modify, and re-encrypt device configurations, enabling credential manipulation and privilege escalation via the GUI import/export functions.
Severity ?
9.8 (Critical)
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-67112"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-321"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-03-19T18:16:15Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "Use of a hard-coded AES-256-CBC key in the configuration backup/restore implementation of Small Cell Sercomm SCE4255W (FreedomFi Englewood) firmware before DG3934v3@2308041842 allows remote authenticated users to decrypt, modify, and re-encrypt device configurations, enabling credential manipulation and privilege escalation via the GUI import/export functions.",
"id": "GHSA-hpw3-vhrj-p6q9",
"modified": "2026-03-24T03:31:19Z",
"published": "2026-03-19T18:31:19Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-67112"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://fcc.report/FCC-ID/P27-SCE4255W/4790935.pdf"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://freedomfi.com/index.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://neroteam.com/blog/freedomfi-sercomm-sce4255w-englewood"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…