GHSA-HGCG-JJ48-WJ2H
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-05-08 15:31 – Updated: 2026-05-15 18:30In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amdgpu: fix sync handling in amdgpu_dma_buf_move_notify
Invalidating a dmabuf will impact other users of the shared BO. In the scenario where process A moves the BO, it needs to inform process B about the move and process B will need to update its page table.
The commit fixes a synchronisation bug caused by the use of the ticket: it made amdgpu_vm_handle_moved behave as if updating the page table immediately was correct but in this case it's not.
An example is the following scenario, with 2 GPUs and glxgears running on GPU0 and Xorg running on GPU1, on a system where P2P PCI isn't supported:
glxgears: export linear buffer from GPU0 and import using GPU1 submit frame rendering to GPU0 submit tiled->linear blit Xorg: copy of linear buffer
The sequence of jobs would be: drm_sched_job_run # GPU0, frame rendering drm_sched_job_queue # GPU0, blit drm_sched_job_done # GPU0, frame rendering drm_sched_job_run # GPU0, blit move linear buffer for GPU1 access # amdgpu_dma_buf_move_notify -> update pt # GPU0
It this point the blit job on GPU0 is still running and would likely produce a page fault.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-43318"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-05-08T14:16:40Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\ndrm/amdgpu: fix sync handling in amdgpu_dma_buf_move_notify\n\nInvalidating a dmabuf will impact other users of the shared BO.\nIn the scenario where process A moves the BO, it needs to inform\nprocess B about the move and process B will need to update its\npage table.\n\nThe commit fixes a synchronisation bug caused by the use of the\nticket: it made amdgpu_vm_handle_moved behave as if updating\nthe page table immediately was correct but in this case it\u0027s not.\n\nAn example is the following scenario, with 2 GPUs and glxgears\nrunning on GPU0 and Xorg running on GPU1, on a system where P2P\nPCI isn\u0027t supported:\n\nglxgears:\n export linear buffer from GPU0 and import using GPU1\n submit frame rendering to GPU0\n submit tiled-\u003elinear blit\nXorg:\n copy of linear buffer\n\nThe sequence of jobs would be:\n drm_sched_job_run # GPU0, frame rendering\n drm_sched_job_queue # GPU0, blit\n drm_sched_job_done # GPU0, frame rendering\n drm_sched_job_run # GPU0, blit\n move linear buffer for GPU1 access #\n amdgpu_dma_buf_move_notify -\u003e update pt # GPU0\n\nIt this point the blit job on GPU0 is still running and would\nlikely produce a page fault.",
"id": "GHSA-hgcg-jj48-wj2h",
"modified": "2026-05-15T18:30:30Z",
"published": "2026-05-08T15:31:23Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-43318"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3307459eb3583115264421e859858d1f90f3694a"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/82a7ea35a1526bef8ae170c33ff80e5db7728961"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/89a9389ad70d3c69538e59d87df67d407aef4c26"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b18fc0ab837381c1a6ef28386602cd888f2d9edf"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.