GHSA-HFG5-H6JX-RGVQ

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-02-04 21:30 – Updated: 2026-02-05 00:31
VLAI?
Details

IBM Db2 Big SQL 7.6 on Cloud Pak for Data 4.8, 7.7 on Cloud Pak for Data 5.0, and 7.8 on Cloud Pak for Data 5.1 does not properly limit allocation of resources which could allow an authenticated user with internal knowledge of the system to cause a denial of service.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2024-39724"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-770"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-02-04T21:15:56Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "IBM Db2 Big SQL 7.6 on Cloud Pak for Data 4.8, 7.7 on Cloud Pak for Data 5.0, and 7.8\u00a0on Cloud Pak for Data 5.1\u00a0does not properly limit allocation of resources which could allow an authenticated user with internal knowledge of the system to cause a denial of service.",
  "id": "GHSA-hfg5-h6jx-rgvq",
  "modified": "2026-02-05T00:31:00Z",
  "published": "2026-02-04T21:30:32Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-39724"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7257907"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…