GHSA-H53C-6597-VMFW

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-04-24 15:32 – Updated: 2026-04-24 15:32
VLAI?
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

wireguard: device: use exit_rtnl callback instead of manual rtnl_lock in pre_exit

wg_netns_pre_exit() manually acquires rtnl_lock() inside the pernet .pre_exit callback. This causes a hung task when another thread holds rtnl_mutex - the cleanup_net workqueue (or the setup_net failure rollback path) blocks indefinitely in wg_netns_pre_exit() waiting to acquire the lock.

Convert to .exit_rtnl, introduced in commit 7a60d91c690b ("net: Add ->exit_rtnl() hook to struct pernet_operations."), where the framework already holds RTNL and batches all callbacks under a single rtnl_lock()/rtnl_unlock() pair, eliminating the contention window.

The rcu_assign_pointer(wg->creating_net, NULL) is safe to move from .pre_exit to .exit_rtnl (which runs after synchronize_rcu()) because all RCU readers of creating_net either use maybe_get_net() - which returns NULL for a dying namespace with zero refcount - or access net->user_ns which remains valid throughout the entire ops_undo_list sequence.

[ Jason: added __net_exit and __read_mostly annotations that were missing. ]

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-31579"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-04-24T15:16:32Z",
    "severity": null
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nwireguard: device: use exit_rtnl callback instead of manual rtnl_lock in pre_exit\n\nwg_netns_pre_exit() manually acquires rtnl_lock() inside the\npernet .pre_exit callback.  This causes a hung task when another\nthread holds rtnl_mutex - the cleanup_net workqueue (or the\nsetup_net failure rollback path) blocks indefinitely in\nwg_netns_pre_exit() waiting to acquire the lock.\n\nConvert to .exit_rtnl, introduced in commit 7a60d91c690b (\"net:\nAdd -\u003eexit_rtnl() hook to struct pernet_operations.\"), where the\nframework already holds RTNL and batches all callbacks under a\nsingle rtnl_lock()/rtnl_unlock() pair, eliminating the contention\nwindow.\n\nThe rcu_assign_pointer(wg-\u003ecreating_net, NULL) is safe to move\nfrom .pre_exit to .exit_rtnl (which runs after synchronize_rcu())\nbecause all RCU readers of creating_net either use maybe_get_net()\n- which returns NULL for a dying namespace with zero refcount - or\naccess net-\u003euser_ns which remains valid throughout the entire\nops_undo_list sequence.\n\n[ Jason: added __net_exit and __read_mostly annotations that were missing. ]",
  "id": "GHSA-h53c-6597-vmfw",
  "modified": "2026-04-24T15:32:34Z",
  "published": "2026-04-24T15:32:34Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-31579"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1c52ef00e391144334f10995985c2f256d4be982"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9a9e69155b2091b8297afaf1533b8d68a3096841"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a1d0f6cbb962af29586e3e65a4bced1a5e39221f"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…