GHSA-H4XG-337C-JQ3V
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 05:48 – Updated: 2022-05-17 05:48
VLAI?
Details
The SIPStationInit implementation in Cisco Unified Communications Manager (aka CUCM, formerly CallManager) 6.1SU before 6.1(5)SU1, 7.0SU before 7.0(2a)SU3, 7.1SU before 7.1(3b)SU2, 7.1 before 7.1(5), and 8.0 before 8.0(1) allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (process failure) via a malformed SIP message, aka Bug ID CSCtd17310.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2010-2837"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2010-08-26T21:00:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "The SIPStationInit implementation in Cisco Unified Communications Manager (aka CUCM, formerly CallManager) 6.1SU before 6.1(5)SU1, 7.0SU before 7.0(2a)SU3, 7.1SU before 7.1(3b)SU2, 7.1 before 7.1(5), and 8.0 before 8.0(1) allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (process failure) via a malformed SIP message, aka Bug ID CSCtd17310.",
"id": "GHSA-h4xg-337c-jq3v",
"modified": "2022-05-17T05:48:31Z",
"published": "2022-05-17T05:48:31Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2010-2837"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/products_security_advisory09186a0080b43908.shtml"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2010/2187"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…