GHSA-H383-GMXW-35V2
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-04-10 18:31 – Updated: 2026-04-14 00:10
VLAI?
Summary
Apache Log4j 1 to Log4j 2 bridge: silent log event loss in Log4j1XmlLayout due to unescaped XML 1.0 forbidden characters
Details
The Log4j1XmlLayout from the Apache Log4j 1-to-Log4j 2 bridge fails to escape characters forbidden by the XML 1.0 standard, producing malformed XML output. Conforming XML parsers are required to reject documents containing such characters with a fatal error, which may cause downstream log processing systems to drop or fail to index affected records.
Two groups of users are affected:
- Those using
Log4j1XmlLayoutdirectly in a Log4j Core 2 configuration file. - Those using the Log4j 1 configuration compatibility layer with
org.apache.log4j.xml.XMLLayoutspecified as the layout class.
Users are advised to upgrade to Apache Log4j 1-to-Log4j 2 bridge version 2.25.4, which corrects this issue.
[!NOTE] The Apache Log4j 1-to-Log4j 2 bridge is deprecated and will not be present in Log4j 3. Users are encouraged to consult the Log4j 1 to Log4j 2 migration guide, and specifically the section on eliminating reliance on the bridge.
Severity ?
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Maven",
"name": "org.apache.logging.log4j:log4j-1.2-api"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "2.7"
},
{
"fixed": "2.25.4"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Maven",
"name": "org.apache.logging.log4j:log4j-1.2-api"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "3.0.0-beta1"
},
{
"last_affected": "3.0.0-beta2"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-34479"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-116"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-04-14T00:10:59Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-04-10T16:16:31Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "The `Log4j1XmlLayout` from the Apache Log4j 1-to-Log4j 2 bridge fails to escape characters forbidden by the XML 1.0 standard, producing malformed XML output. Conforming XML parsers are required to reject documents containing such characters with a fatal error, which may cause downstream log processing systems to drop or fail to index affected records.\n\nTwo groups of users are affected:\n\n* Those using `Log4j1XmlLayout` directly in a Log4j Core 2 configuration file.\n* Those using the Log4j 1 configuration compatibility layer with `org.apache.log4j.xml.XMLLayout` specified as the layout class.\n\nUsers are advised to upgrade to Apache Log4j 1-to-Log4j 2 bridge version `2.25.4`, which corrects this issue.\n\n\u003e [!NOTE]\n\u003e The Apache Log4j 1-to-Log4j 2 bridge is deprecated and will not be present in Log4j 3. Users are encouraged to consult the\n\u003e [Log4j 1 to Log4j 2 migration guide](https://logging.apache.org/log4j/2.x/migrate-from-log4j1.html), and specifically the section on eliminating reliance on the bridge.",
"id": "GHSA-h383-gmxw-35v2",
"modified": "2026-04-14T00:10:59Z",
"published": "2026-04-10T18:31:18Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-34479"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/4078"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread/gd0hp6mj17rn3kj279vgy4p7kd4zz5on"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://logging.apache.org/cyclonedx/vdr.xml"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://logging.apache.org/log4j/2.x/migrate-from-log4j1.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://logging.apache.org/security.html#CVE-2026-34479"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/04/10/8"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:L/SA:N",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
],
"summary": "Apache Log4j 1 to Log4j 2 bridge: silent log event loss in Log4j1XmlLayout due to unescaped XML 1.0 forbidden characters"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…