GHSA-GVVC-PV9R-RG5Q
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 17:07 – Updated: 2022-05-24 17:07
VLAI?
Details
The daemon in Tor through 0.4.1.8 and 0.4.2.x through 0.4.2.6 does not verify that a rendezvous node is known before attempting to connect to it, which might make it easier for remote attackers to discover circuit information.
Severity ?
5.3 (Medium)
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2020-8516"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-200"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2020-02-02T13:15:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "The daemon in Tor through 0.4.1.8 and 0.4.2.x through 0.4.2.6 does not verify that a rendezvous node is known before attempting to connect to it, which might make it easier for remote attackers to discover circuit information.",
"id": "GHSA-gvvc-pv9r-rg5q",
"modified": "2022-05-24T17:07:52Z",
"published": "2022-05-24T17:07:52Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-8516"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-dev/2020-February/014146.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-dev/2020-February/014147.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2020-8516"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/33129"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.hackerfactor.com/blog/index.php?/archives/868-Deanonymizing-Tor-Circuits.html"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…