GHSA-GJQP-7XQ4-7MR3

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-04-30 18:18 – Updated: 2022-04-30 18:18
VLAI?
Details

Format string vulnerability in the administration function in Cisco Secure Access Control Server (ACS) for Windows, 2.6.x and earlier and 3.x through 3.01 (build 40), allows remote attackers to crash the CSADMIN module only (denial of service of administration function) or execute arbitrary code via format strings in the URL to port 2002.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2002-0159"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-134"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2002-04-22T04:00:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Format string vulnerability in the administration function in Cisco Secure Access Control Server (ACS) for Windows, 2.6.x and earlier and 3.x through 3.01 (build 40), allows remote attackers to crash the CSADMIN  module only (denial of service of administration function) or execute arbitrary code via format strings in the URL to port 2002.",
  "id": "GHSA-gjqp-7xq4-7mr3",
  "modified": "2022-04-30T18:18:39Z",
  "published": "2022-04-30T18:18:39Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2002-0159"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq\u0026m=101787248913611\u0026w=2"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/ACS-Win-Web.shtml"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.iss.net/security_center/static/8742.php"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.osvdb.org/2062"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/4416"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…