GHSA-GFMC-C69M-6HJV
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-01 06:51 – Updated: 2022-05-01 06:51
VLAI?
Details
Buffer overflow in the is_client_wad_ok function in w_wad.cpp for (1) Zdaemon 1.08.01 and (2) X-Doom allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long filename argument.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2006-1592"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2006-04-03T10:04:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Buffer overflow in the is_client_wad_ok function in w_wad.cpp for (1) Zdaemon 1.08.01 and (2) X-Doom allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long filename argument.",
"id": "GHSA-gfmc-c69m-6hjv",
"modified": "2022-05-01T06:51:04Z",
"published": "2022-05-01T06:51:04Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2006-1592"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/25592"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://aluigi.altervista.org/adv/zdaebof-adv.txt"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/2006-March/044775.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/19496"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/19509"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/429521/100/0/threaded"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/17340"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2006/1198"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2006/1199"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…