GHSA-GF68-MP28-3R2V
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-01-14 15:32 – Updated: 2026-01-14 15:32In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
scs: fix a wrong parameter in __scs_magic
__scs_magic() needs a 'void ' variable, but a 'struct task_struct ' is given. 'task_scs(tsk)' is the starting address of the task's shadow call stack, and '__scs_magic(task_scs(tsk))' is the end address of the task's shadow call stack. Here should be '__scs_magic(task_scs(tsk))'.
The user-visible effect of this bug is that when CONFIG_DEBUG_STACK_USAGE is enabled, the shadow call stack usage checking function (scs_check_usage) would scan an incorrect memory range. This could lead
-
Inaccurate stack usage reporting: The function would calculate wrong usage statistics for the shadow call stack, potentially showing incorrect value in kmsg.
-
Potential kernel crash: If the value of __scs_magic(tsk)is greater than that of __scs_magic(task_scs(tsk)), the for loop may access unmapped memory, potentially causing a kernel panic. However, this scenario is unlikely because task_struct is allocated via the slab allocator (which typically returns lower addresses), while the shadow call stack returned by task_scs(tsk) is allocated via vmalloc(which typically returns higher addresses).
However, since this is purely a debugging feature (CONFIG_DEBUG_STACK_USAGE), normal production systems should be not unaffected. The bug only impacts developers and testers who are actively debugging stack usage with this configuration enabled.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-71102"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-01-14T15:15:59Z",
"severity": null
},
"details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nscs: fix a wrong parameter in __scs_magic\n\n__scs_magic() needs a \u0027void *\u0027 variable, but a \u0027struct task_struct *\u0027 is\ngiven. \u0027task_scs(tsk)\u0027 is the starting address of the task\u0027s shadow call\nstack, and \u0027__scs_magic(task_scs(tsk))\u0027 is the end address of the task\u0027s\nshadow call stack. Here should be \u0027__scs_magic(task_scs(tsk))\u0027.\n\nThe user-visible effect of this bug is that when CONFIG_DEBUG_STACK_USAGE\nis enabled, the shadow call stack usage checking function\n(scs_check_usage) would scan an incorrect memory range. This could lead\n\n1. **Inaccurate stack usage reporting**: The function would calculate\n wrong usage statistics for the shadow call stack, potentially showing\n incorrect value in kmsg.\n\n2. **Potential kernel crash**: If the value of __scs_magic(tsk)is\n greater than that of __scs_magic(task_scs(tsk)), the for loop may\n access unmapped memory, potentially causing a kernel panic. However,\n this scenario is unlikely because task_struct is allocated via the slab\n allocator (which typically returns lower addresses), while the shadow\n call stack returned by task_scs(tsk) is allocated via vmalloc(which\n typically returns higher addresses).\n\nHowever, since this is purely a debugging feature\n(CONFIG_DEBUG_STACK_USAGE), normal production systems should be not\nunaffected. The bug only impacts developers and testers who are actively\ndebugging stack usage with this configuration enabled.",
"id": "GHSA-gf68-mp28-3r2v",
"modified": "2026-01-14T15:32:59Z",
"published": "2026-01-14T15:32:59Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-71102"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/062774439d442882b44f5eab8c256ad3423ef284"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/08bd4c46d5e63b78e77f2605283874bbe868ab19"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/57ba40b001be27786d0570dd292289df748b306b"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9ef28943471a16e4f9646bc3e8e2de148e7d8d7b"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a19fb3611e4c06624fc0f83ef19f4fb8d57d4751"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.