GHSA-G9H3-F67F-JQJ7

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-03-18 18:31 – Updated: 2026-03-18 18:31
VLAI?
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

xfs: check return value of xchk_scrub_create_subord

Fix this function to return NULL instead of a mangled ENOMEM, then fix the callers to actually check for a null pointer and return ENOMEM. Most of the corrections here are for code merged between 6.2 and 6.10.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-23250"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-03-18T18:16:22Z",
    "severity": null
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nxfs: check return value of xchk_scrub_create_subord\n\nFix this function to return NULL instead of a mangled ENOMEM, then fix\nthe callers to actually check for a null pointer and return ENOMEM.\nMost of the corrections here are for code merged between 6.2 and 6.10.",
  "id": "GHSA-g9h3-f67f-jqj7",
  "modified": "2026-03-18T18:31:17Z",
  "published": "2026-03-18T18:31:17Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-23250"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2b658d1249666cc55af9484dcf5f45ca438d4ecc"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b2df809edd8cb7d1c3e19d9f6aabc2bd55d2bfb6"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ca27313fb3f23e4ac18532ede4ec1c7cc5814c4a"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d6f3f7d4dd8a179394cef03c00993d57f5f68601"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…