GHSA-FWHW-CHW4-GH37
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-02-02 09:30 – Updated: 2026-02-02 21:23
VLAI?
Summary
Keycloak Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability
Details
A flaw was found in Keycloak’s CIBA feature where insufficient validation of client-configured backchannel notification endpoints could allow blind server-side requests to internal services.
Severity ?
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Maven",
"name": "org.keycloak:keycloak-parent"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"last_affected": "26.5.2"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-1518"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-918"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-02-02T21:23:18Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-02-02T08:16:06Z",
"severity": "LOW"
},
"details": "A flaw was found in Keycloak\u2019s CIBA feature where insufficient validation of client-configured backchannel notification endpoints could allow blind server-side requests to internal services.",
"id": "GHSA-fwhw-chw4-gh37",
"modified": "2026-02-02T21:23:18Z",
"published": "2026-02-02T09:30:30Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-1518"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-1518"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2433727"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/keycloak/keycloak"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Keycloak Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…