GHSA-FMV9-88MW-756M
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 05:43 – Updated: 2025-04-11 03:43
VLAI?
Details
Stack-based buffer overflow in the IMAP server component in GroupWise Internet Agent (GWIA) in Novell GroupWise 7.x before 7.0 post-SP4 FTF and 8.x before 8.0 SP2 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long mailbox name in a CREATE command.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2010-2777"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-119"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2011-01-28T22:00:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Stack-based buffer overflow in the IMAP server component in GroupWise Internet Agent (GWIA) in Novell GroupWise 7.x before 7.0 post-SP4 FTF and 8.x before 8.0 SP2 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long mailbox name in a CREATE command.",
"id": "GHSA-fmv9-88mw-756m",
"modified": "2025-04-11T03:43:28Z",
"published": "2022-05-17T05:43:50Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2010-2777"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=597331"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.novell.com/support/viewContent.do?externalId=7006374\u0026sliceId=1"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://zerodayinitiative.com/advisories/ZDI-10-129"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…