GHSA-F943-XCHC-QCMP

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-02-12 00:01 – Updated: 2022-02-12 00:01
VLAI?
Details

perM 0.4.0 has a Buffer Overflow related to strncpy. (Debian initially fixed this in 0.4.0-7.)

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2021-38172"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-120"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2022-02-05T18:15:00Z",
    "severity": "CRITICAL"
  },
  "details": "perM 0.4.0 has a Buffer Overflow related to strncpy. (Debian initially fixed this in 0.4.0-7.)",
  "id": "GHSA-f943-xchc-qcmp",
  "modified": "2022-02-12T00:01:09Z",
  "published": "2022-02-12T00:01:09Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-38172"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=993019"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-med/2021/08/msg00016.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://packages.qa.debian.org/p/perm.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/perm/-/commits/master"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/perm"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…