GHSA-F8V4-F26H-67PP
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-01 02:15 – Updated: 2022-05-01 02:15
VLAI?
Details
login.php in myBloggie 2.1.3 beta and earlier allows remote attackers to bypass a whitelist regular expression and conduct SQL injection attacks via a username parameter with SQL after a null character, which causes the whitelist check to succeed but injects the SQL into a query string, a different vulnerability than CVE-2005-2838. NOTE: it is possible that this is actually a bug in PHP code, in which case this should not be treated as a myBloggie vulnerability.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2005-3153"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2005-10-05T22:02:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "login.php in myBloggie 2.1.3 beta and earlier allows remote attackers to bypass a whitelist regular expression and conduct SQL injection attacks via a username parameter with SQL after a null character, which causes the whitelist check to succeed but injects the SQL into a query string, a different vulnerability than CVE-2005-2838. NOTE: it is possible that this is actually a bug in PHP code, in which case this should not be treated as a myBloggie vulnerability.",
"id": "GHSA-f8v4-f26h-67pp",
"modified": "2022-05-01T02:15:03Z",
"published": "2022-05-01T02:15:03Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2005-3153"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq\u0026m=112818273307878\u0026w=2"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://mywebland.com/forums/showtopic.php?t=399"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://rgod.altervista.org/mybloggie213b.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://securityreason.com/securityalert/42"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://securitytracker.com/id?1014995"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.osvdb.org/19935"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…