GHSA-F296-F6R3-PGJG

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-02 03:18 – Updated: 2025-04-09 04:06
VLAI?
Details

The response_addname function in response.c in Daniel J. Bernstein djbdns 1.05 and earlier does not constrain offsets in the required manner, which allows remote attackers, with control over a third-party subdomain served by tinydns and axfrdns, to trigger DNS responses containing arbitrary records via crafted zone data for this subdomain.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2009-0858"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-20"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2009-03-09T21:30:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "The response_addname function in response.c in Daniel J. Bernstein djbdns 1.05 and earlier does not constrain offsets in the required manner, which allows remote attackers, with control over a third-party subdomain served by tinydns and axfrdns, to trigger DNS responses containing arbitrary records via crafted zone data for this subdomain.",
  "id": "GHSA-f296-f6r3-pgjg",
  "modified": "2025-04-09T04:06:10Z",
  "published": "2022-05-02T03:18:52Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2009-0858"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/49003"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/03/05/2014249"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://marc.info/?l=djbdns\u0026m=123554945710038"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://marc.info/?l=djbdns\u0026m=123613000920446\u0026w=2"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/35820"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://securityandthe.net/2009/03/05/security-issue-in-djbdns-confirmed"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2009/dsa-1831"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/501294/100/0/threaded"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/501340/100/0/threaded"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/501479/100/0/threaded"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/33937"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…