GHSA-F296-F6R3-PGJG
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-02 03:18 – Updated: 2025-04-09 04:06
VLAI?
Details
The response_addname function in response.c in Daniel J. Bernstein djbdns 1.05 and earlier does not constrain offsets in the required manner, which allows remote attackers, with control over a third-party subdomain served by tinydns and axfrdns, to trigger DNS responses containing arbitrary records via crafted zone data for this subdomain.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2009-0858"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-20"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2009-03-09T21:30:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "The response_addname function in response.c in Daniel J. Bernstein djbdns 1.05 and earlier does not constrain offsets in the required manner, which allows remote attackers, with control over a third-party subdomain served by tinydns and axfrdns, to trigger DNS responses containing arbitrary records via crafted zone data for this subdomain.",
"id": "GHSA-f296-f6r3-pgjg",
"modified": "2025-04-09T04:06:10Z",
"published": "2022-05-02T03:18:52Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2009-0858"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/49003"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/03/05/2014249"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://marc.info/?l=djbdns\u0026m=123554945710038"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://marc.info/?l=djbdns\u0026m=123613000920446\u0026w=2"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/35820"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://securityandthe.net/2009/03/05/security-issue-in-djbdns-confirmed"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2009/dsa-1831"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/501294/100/0/threaded"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/501340/100/0/threaded"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/501479/100/0/threaded"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/33937"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…