GHSA-CXC8-98JF-GX9H
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 05:44 – Updated: 2022-05-17 05:44
VLAI?
Details
Multiple buffer overflows in ha.c in the mipv6 daemon in UMIP 0.4 allow remote attackers to have an unspecified impact via a crafted (1) ND_OPT_PREFIX_INFORMATION or (2) ND_OPT_HOME_AGENT_INFO packet.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2010-2523"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-119"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2010-07-13T17:30:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Multiple buffer overflows in ha.c in the mipv6 daemon in UMIP 0.4 allow remote attackers to have an unspecified impact via a crafted (1) ND_OPT_PREFIX_INFORMATION or (2) ND_OPT_HOME_AGENT_INFO packet.",
"id": "GHSA-cxc8-98jf-gx9h",
"modified": "2022-05-17T05:44:35Z",
"published": "2022-05-17T05:44:35Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2010-2523"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2010-10/msg00006.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://marc.info/?l=oss-security\u0026m=127850299910685\u0026w=2"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://marc.info/?l=oss-security\u0026m=127859390815405\u0026w=2"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/07/06/5"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/07/07/4"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/07/09/1"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/41522"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…