GHSA-CX6C-45WP-F5PR

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-04-03 18:31 – Updated: 2026-04-18 09:30
VLAI?
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

net/rose: fix NULL pointer dereference in rose_transmit_link on reconnect

syzkaller reported a bug [1], and the reproducer is available at [2].

ROSE sockets use four sk->sk_state values: TCP_CLOSE, TCP_LISTEN, TCP_SYN_SENT, and TCP_ESTABLISHED. rose_connect() already rejects calls for TCP_ESTABLISHED (-EISCONN) and TCP_CLOSE with SS_CONNECTING (-ECONNREFUSED), but lacks a check for TCP_SYN_SENT.

When rose_connect() is called a second time while the first connection attempt is still in progress (TCP_SYN_SENT), it overwrites rose->neighbour via rose_get_neigh(). If that returns NULL, the socket is left with rose->state == ROSE_STATE_1 but rose->neighbour == NULL. When the socket is subsequently closed, rose_release() sees ROSE_STATE_1 and calls rose_write_internal() -> rose_transmit_link(skb, NULL), causing a NULL pointer dereference.

Per connect(2), a second connect() while a connection is already in progress should return -EALREADY. Add this missing check for TCP_SYN_SENT to complete the state validation in rose_connect().

[1] https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=d00f90e0af54102fb271 [2] https://gist.github.com/mrpre/9e6779e0d13e2c66779b1653fef80516

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-23460"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-04-03T16:16:32Z",
    "severity": null
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnet/rose: fix NULL pointer dereference in rose_transmit_link on reconnect\n\nsyzkaller reported a bug [1], and the reproducer is available at [2].\n\nROSE sockets use four sk-\u003esk_state values: TCP_CLOSE, TCP_LISTEN,\nTCP_SYN_SENT, and TCP_ESTABLISHED. rose_connect() already rejects\ncalls for TCP_ESTABLISHED (-EISCONN) and TCP_CLOSE with SS_CONNECTING\n(-ECONNREFUSED), but lacks a check for TCP_SYN_SENT.\n\nWhen rose_connect() is called a second time while the first connection\nattempt is still in progress (TCP_SYN_SENT), it overwrites\nrose-\u003eneighbour via rose_get_neigh(). If that returns NULL, the socket\nis left with rose-\u003estate == ROSE_STATE_1 but rose-\u003eneighbour == NULL.\nWhen the socket is subsequently closed, rose_release() sees\nROSE_STATE_1 and calls rose_write_internal() -\u003e\nrose_transmit_link(skb, NULL), causing a NULL pointer dereference.\n\nPer connect(2), a second connect() while a connection is already in\nprogress should return -EALREADY. Add this missing check for\nTCP_SYN_SENT to complete the state validation in rose_connect().\n\n[1] https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=d00f90e0af54102fb271\n[2] https://gist.github.com/mrpre/9e6779e0d13e2c66779b1653fef80516",
  "id": "GHSA-cx6c-45wp-f5pr",
  "modified": "2026-04-18T09:30:19Z",
  "published": "2026-04-03T18:31:22Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-23460"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0c3e8bff808f17ad37a51d8e719eed22c7863120"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0c9fb70a206a8734e10468ecc24d57c7596cf64e"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/508f49ccbe0329641bb681f7d0052bb4e5943252"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a12254050e3050f1011cd24f3b880a6882d0139d"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a753844d2a8136f090123c8fb1ff6c7f6ee7c2b3"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c2ab74c12932e52cfa1e7e4582d42b0c8bec96c7"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c85fe6580e86947ca07907ebf4363a73c156fda7"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e1f0a18c9564cdb16523c802e2c6fe5874e3d944"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…