GHSA-CW35-P78F-2QFC

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-04-29 01:26 – Updated: 2022-04-29 01:26
VLAI?
Details

Cistron RADIUS daemon (radiusd-cistron) 1.6.6 and earlier allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service and possibly execute arbitrary code via a large value in an NAS-Port attribute, which is interpreted as a negative number and causes a buffer overflow.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2003-0450"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2003-08-07T04:00:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Cistron RADIUS daemon (radiusd-cistron) 1.6.6 and earlier allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service and possibly execute arbitrary code via a large value in an NAS-Port attribute, which is interpreted as a negative number and causes a buffer overflow.",
  "id": "GHSA-cw35-p78f-2qfc",
  "modified": "2022-04-29T01:26:26Z",
  "published": "2022-04-29T01:26:26Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2003-0450"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=196063"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://distro.conectiva.com.br/atualizacoes/?id=a\u0026anuncio=000664"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2003/dsa-321"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.novell.com/linux/security/advisories/2003_030_radiusd_cistron.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.turbolinux.com/security/TLSA-2003-40.txt"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…