GHSA-CGRJ-W8M6-F297
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-02-14 18:30 – Updated: 2026-02-14 18:30In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
rust_binder: correctly handle FDA objects of length zero
Fix a bug where an empty FDA (fd array) object with 0 fds would cause an
out-of-bounds error. The previous implementation used skip == 0 to
mean "this is a pointer fixup", but 0 is also the correct skip length
for an empty FDA. If the FDA is at the end of the buffer, then this
results in an attempt to write 8-bytes out of bounds. This is caught and
results in an EINVAL error being returned to userspace.
The pattern of using skip == 0 as a special value originates from the
C-implementation of Binder. As part of fixing this bug, this pattern is
replaced with a Rust enum.
I considered the alternate option of not pushing a fixup when the length is zero, but I think it's cleaner to just get rid of the zero-is-special stuff.
The root cause of this bug was diagnosed by Gemini CLI on first try. I used the following prompt:
There appears to be a bug in @drivers/android/binder/thread.rs where the Fixups oob bug is triggered with 316 304 316 324. This implies that we somehow ended up with a fixup where buffer A has a pointer to buffer B, but the pointer is located at an index in buffer A that is out of bounds. Please investigate the code to find the bug. You may compare with @drivers/android/binder.c that implements this correctly.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-23194"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-02-14T17:15:57Z",
"severity": null
},
"details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nrust_binder: correctly handle FDA objects of length zero\n\nFix a bug where an empty FDA (fd array) object with 0 fds would cause an\nout-of-bounds error. The previous implementation used `skip == 0` to\nmean \"this is a pointer fixup\", but 0 is also the correct skip length\nfor an empty FDA. If the FDA is at the end of the buffer, then this\nresults in an attempt to write 8-bytes out of bounds. This is caught and\nresults in an EINVAL error being returned to userspace.\n\nThe pattern of using `skip == 0` as a special value originates from the\nC-implementation of Binder. As part of fixing this bug, this pattern is\nreplaced with a Rust enum.\n\nI considered the alternate option of not pushing a fixup when the length\nis zero, but I think it\u0027s cleaner to just get rid of the zero-is-special\nstuff.\n\nThe root cause of this bug was diagnosed by Gemini CLI on first try. I\nused the following prompt:\n\n\u003e There appears to be a bug in @drivers/android/binder/thread.rs where\n\u003e the Fixups oob bug is triggered with 316 304 316 324. This implies\n\u003e that we somehow ended up with a fixup where buffer A has a pointer to\n\u003e buffer B, but the pointer is located at an index in buffer A that is\n\u003e out of bounds. Please investigate the code to find the bug. You may\n\u003e compare with @drivers/android/binder.c that implements this correctly.",
"id": "GHSA-cgrj-w8m6-f297",
"modified": "2026-02-14T18:30:16Z",
"published": "2026-02-14T18:30:16Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-23194"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/598fe3ff32e43918ed8a062f55432b3d23e6340c"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8f589c9c3be539d6c2b393c82940c3783831082f"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.