GHSA-C8M8-3JCR-6RJ5

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-03-07 02:31 – Updated: 2026-05-11 16:22
VLAI?
Summary
FUXA has a hardcoded fallback JWT signing secret
Details

FUXA used a static fallback JWT signing secret (frangoteam751) when no secretCode was configured.

If authentication was enabled without explicitly setting a custom secret, an attacker who knew the default value could forge valid JWT tokens and bypass authentication.

This issue has been addressed in version 1.3.0 by removing the static fallback and generating a secure random secret when no secretCode is provided.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "database_specific": {
        "last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 1.2.11"
      },
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "npm",
        "name": "@frangoteam/fuxa"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "1.3.0"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-69971"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-321",
      "CWE-798"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-03-07T02:31:18Z",
    "nvd_published_at": null,
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "FUXA used a static fallback JWT signing secret (`frangoteam751`) when no `secretCode` was configured.\n\nIf authentication was enabled without explicitly setting a custom secret, an attacker who knew the default value could forge valid JWT tokens and bypass authentication.\n\nThis issue has been addressed in version 1.3.0 by removing the static fallback and generating a secure random secret when no `secretCode` is provided.",
  "id": "GHSA-c8m8-3jcr-6rj5",
  "modified": "2026-05-11T16:22:16Z",
  "published": "2026-03-07T02:31:18Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/frangoteam/FUXA/security/advisories/GHSA-c8m8-3jcr-6rj5"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-69971"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/frangoteam/FUXA"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/frangoteam/FUXA/blob/master/server/api/jwt-helper.js"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    },
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "FUXA has a hardcoded fallback JWT signing secret"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…