GHSA-9W6R-M8W5-8XW6

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 01:53 – Updated: 2025-04-11 03:50
VLAI?
Details

Unspecified vulnerability in Medtronic Paradigm wireless insulin pump 512, 522, 712, and 722 allows remote attackers to modify the delivery of an insulin bolus dose and cause a denial of service (adverse human health effects) via unspecified vectors involving wireless communications and knowledge of the device's serial number, as demonstrated by Jerome Radcliffe at the Black Hat USA conference in August 2011. NOTE: the vendor has disputed the severity of this issue, saying "we believe the risk of deliberate, malicious, or unauthorized manipulation of medical devices is extremely low... we strongly believe it would be extremely difficult for a third-party to wirelessly tamper with your insulin pump... you would be able to detect tones on the insulin pump that weren't intentionally programmed and could intervene accordingly."

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2011-3386"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2011-09-02T23:55:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "Unspecified vulnerability in Medtronic Paradigm wireless insulin pump 512, 522, 712, and 722 allows remote attackers to modify the delivery of an insulin bolus dose and cause a denial of service (adverse human health effects) via unspecified vectors involving wireless communications and knowledge of the device\u0027s serial number, as demonstrated by Jerome Radcliffe at the Black Hat USA conference in August 2011.  NOTE: the vendor has disputed the severity of this issue, saying \"we believe the risk of deliberate, malicious, or unauthorized manipulation of medical devices is extremely low... we strongly believe it would be extremely difficult for a third-party to wirelessly tamper with your insulin pump... you would be able to detect tones on the insulin pump that weren\u0027t intentionally programmed and could intervene accordingly.\"",
  "id": "GHSA-9w6r-m8w5-8xw6",
  "modified": "2025-04-11T03:50:14Z",
  "published": "2022-05-17T01:53:27Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2011-3386"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/69643"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://sixuntilme.com/blog2/2011/08/hacked_jay_radcliffe_insulin_p.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.darkreading.com/security/vulnerabilities/231300312/getting-root-on-the-human-body.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2011/08/04/insulin-pumps-vulnerable-to-hacking/?test=faces"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.hanselman.com/blog/HackersCanKillDiabeticsWithInsulinPumpsFromAHalfMileAwayUmNoFactsVsJournalisticFearMongering.aspx"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.informationweek.com/news/security/vulnerabilities/231600265"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.loop-blog.com/Blog_Full_Post?id=a09C000000Dbz3JIAR"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.scmagazineus.com/black-hat-insulin-pumps-can-be-hacked/article/209106"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…