GHSA-9VXV-JFQW-372J

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-03-11 09:31 – Updated: 2026-03-11 09:31
VLAI?
Details

The Happy Addons for Elementor plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference in all versions up to, and including, 3.21.0 via the ha_condition_update AJAX action. This is due to the validate_reqeust() method using current_user_can('edit_posts', $template_id) instead of current_user_can('edit_post', $template_id) — failing to perform object-level authorization. Additionally, the ha_get_current_condition AJAX action lacks a capability check. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to modify the display conditions of any published ha_library template. Because the cond_to_html() renderer outputs condition values into HTML attributes without proper escaping (using string concatenation instead of esc_attr()), an attacker can inject event handler attributes (e.g., onmouseover) that execute JavaScript when an administrator views the Template Conditions panel, resulting in Stored Cross-Site Scripting.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-2918"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-639"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-03-11T08:16:03Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "The Happy Addons for Elementor plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference in all versions up to, and including, 3.21.0 via the `ha_condition_update` AJAX action. This is due to the `validate_reqeust()` method using `current_user_can(\u0027edit_posts\u0027, $template_id)` instead of `current_user_can(\u0027edit_post\u0027, $template_id)` \u2014 failing to perform object-level authorization. Additionally, the `ha_get_current_condition` AJAX action lacks a capability check. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to modify the display conditions of any published `ha_library` template. Because the `cond_to_html()` renderer outputs condition values into HTML attributes without proper escaping (using string concatenation instead of `esc_attr()`), an attacker can inject event handler attributes (e.g., `onmouseover`) that execute JavaScript when an administrator views the Template Conditions panel, resulting in Stored Cross-Site Scripting.",
  "id": "GHSA-9vxv-jfqw-372j",
  "modified": "2026-03-11T09:31:54Z",
  "published": "2026-03-11T09:31:54Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-2918"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/happy-elementor-addons/tags/3.20.7/classes/condition-manager.php#L237"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/happy-elementor-addons/tags/3.20.7/classes/condition-manager.php#L525"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/happy-elementor-addons/trunk/classes/condition-manager.php#L237"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/happy-elementor-addons/trunk/classes/condition-manager.php#L525"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/changeset?sfp_email=\u0026sfph_mail=\u0026reponame=\u0026new=3475242%40happy-elementor-addons%2Ftrunk\u0026old=3463375%40happy-elementor-addons%2Ftrunk\u0026sfp_email=\u0026sfph_mail="
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/1a3fe49b-cc0d-4b29-aae5-46307483b8d4?source=cve"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…