GHSA-9RCH-5M7J-5MJM
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 01:43 – Updated: 2025-04-11 04:01
VLAI?
Details
The python SDK before 3.1.0.6 and CLI before 3.1.0.8 for oVirt 3.1 does not check the server SSL certificate against the client keys, which allows remote attackers to spoof a server via a man-in-the-middle (MITM) attack.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2012-3533"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2012-08-31T20:55:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "The python SDK before 3.1.0.6 and CLI before 3.1.0.8 for oVirt 3.1 does not check the server SSL certificate against the client keys, which allows remote attackers to spoof a server via a man-in-the-middle (MITM) attack.",
"id": "GHSA-9rch-5m7j-5mjm",
"modified": "2025-04-11T04:01:45Z",
"published": "2022-05-17T01:43:43Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2012-3533"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851672"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/77984"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/7209"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/7249"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/50409"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/08/24/6"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/08/26/1"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/55208"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…