GHSA-9P67-72C6-M54H

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-04-22 09:31 – Updated: 2026-04-22 09:31
VLAI?
Details

The mCatFilter plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to and including 0.5.2. This is due to the complete absence of nonce verification and capability checks in the compute_post() function, which processes settings updates. The compute_post() function is called in the plugin constructor on every page load via the plugins_loaded hook, and it directly processes $_POST data to modify plugin settings via update_option() without any CSRF token validation. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify all plugin settings, including category exclusion rules, feed exclusion flags, and tag page exclusion flags, via a forged POST request, granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking a link.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-4139"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-352"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-04-22T09:16:24Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "The mCatFilter plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to and including 0.5.2. This is due to the complete absence of nonce verification and capability checks in the compute_post() function, which processes settings updates. The compute_post() function is called in the plugin constructor on every page load via the plugins_loaded hook, and it directly processes $_POST data to modify plugin settings via update_option() without any CSRF token validation. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify all plugin settings, including category exclusion rules, feed exclusion flags, and tag page exclusion flags, via a forged POST request, granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking a link.",
  "id": "GHSA-9p67-72c6-m54h",
  "modified": "2026-04-22T09:31:33Z",
  "published": "2026-04-22T09:31:33Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-4139"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/mcatfilter/tags/0.5.2/mcatfilter.php#L138"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/mcatfilter/tags/0.5.2/mcatfilter.php#L320"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/mcatfilter/tags/0.5.2/mcatfilter.php#L339"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/mcatfilter/trunk/mcatfilter.php#L138"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/mcatfilter/trunk/mcatfilter.php#L320"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/mcatfilter/trunk/mcatfilter.php#L339"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/622ee6c8-7739-44ae-b88f-63a93c0a9b20?source=cve"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…