GHSA-9MVC-6GRP-8HGM

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-04-24 15:32 – Updated: 2026-04-24 15:32
VLAI?
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

PCI: endpoint: pci-epf-vntb: Remove duplicate resource teardown

epf_ntb_epc_destroy() duplicates the teardown that the caller is supposed to perform later. This leads to an oops when .allow_link fails or when .drop_link is performed. The following is an example oops of the former case:

Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address dead000000000108 [...] [dead000000000108] address between user and kernel address ranges Internal error: Oops: 0000000096000044 [#1] SMP [...] Call trace: pci_epc_remove_epf+0x78/0xe0 (P) pci_primary_epc_epf_link+0x88/0xa8 configfs_symlink+0x1f4/0x5a0 vfs_symlink+0x134/0x1d8 do_symlinkat+0x88/0x138 __arm64_sys_symlinkat+0x74/0xe0 [...]

Remove the helper, and drop pci_epc_put(). EPC device refcounting is tied to the configfs EPC group lifetime, and pci_epc_put() in the .drop_link path is sufficient.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-31594"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-04-24T15:16:37Z",
    "severity": null
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nPCI: endpoint: pci-epf-vntb: Remove duplicate resource teardown\n\nepf_ntb_epc_destroy() duplicates the teardown that the caller is\nsupposed to perform later. This leads to an oops when .allow_link fails\nor when .drop_link is performed. The following is an example oops of the\nformer case:\n\n  Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address dead000000000108\n  [...]\n  [dead000000000108] address between user and kernel address ranges\n  Internal error: Oops: 0000000096000044 [#1]  SMP\n  [...]\n  Call trace:\n   pci_epc_remove_epf+0x78/0xe0 (P)\n   pci_primary_epc_epf_link+0x88/0xa8\n   configfs_symlink+0x1f4/0x5a0\n   vfs_symlink+0x134/0x1d8\n   do_symlinkat+0x88/0x138\n   __arm64_sys_symlinkat+0x74/0xe0\n  [...]\n\nRemove the helper, and drop pci_epc_put(). EPC device refcounting is\ntied to the configfs EPC group lifetime, and pci_epc_put() in the\n.drop_link path is sufficient.",
  "id": "GHSA-9mvc-6grp-8hgm",
  "modified": "2026-04-24T15:32:34Z",
  "published": "2026-04-24T15:32:34Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-31594"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/478e776101592eb63298714e96823ef78a3295ec"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a7a3cab4d33fd8a8aed864c447d0d7c99e85404e"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/cec9ead73ab154a7953f6ab8dd5127e0d6bbf95a"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…