GHSA-8QV8-8MPP-CC7J

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-03-18 18:31 – Updated: 2026-04-18 09:30
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

apparmor: fix unprivileged local user can do privileged policy management

An unprivileged local user can load, replace, and remove profiles by opening the apparmorfs interfaces, via a confused deputy attack, by passing the opened fd to a privileged process, and getting the privileged process to write to the interface.

This does require a privileged target that can be manipulated to do the write for the unprivileged process, but once such access is achieved full policy management is possible and all the possible implications that implies: removing confinement, DoS of system or target applications by denying all execution, by-passing the unprivileged user namespace restriction, to exploiting kernel bugs for a local privilege escalation.

The policy management interface can not have its permissions simply changed from 0666 to 0600 because non-root processes need to be able to load policy to different policy namespaces.

Instead ensure the task writing the interface has privileges that are a subset of the task that opened the interface. This is already done via policy for confined processes, but unconfined can delegate access to the opened fd, by-passing the usual policy check.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-23268"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-03-18T18:16:25Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\napparmor: fix unprivileged local user can do privileged policy management\n\nAn unprivileged local user can load, replace, and remove profiles by\nopening the apparmorfs interfaces, via a confused deputy attack, by\npassing the opened fd to a privileged process, and getting the\nprivileged process to write to the interface.\n\nThis does require a privileged target that can be manipulated to do\nthe write for the unprivileged process, but once such access is\nachieved full policy management is possible and all the possible\nimplications that implies: removing confinement, DoS of system or\ntarget applications by denying all execution, by-passing the\nunprivileged user namespace restriction, to exploiting kernel bugs for\na local privilege escalation.\n\nThe policy management interface can not have its permissions simply\nchanged from 0666 to 0600 because non-root processes need to be able\nto load policy to different policy namespaces.\n\nInstead ensure the task writing the interface has privileges that\nare a subset of the task that opened the interface. This is already\ndone via policy for confined processes, but unconfined can delegate\naccess to the opened fd, by-passing the usual policy check.",
  "id": "GHSA-8qv8-8mpp-cc7j",
  "modified": "2026-04-18T09:30:17Z",
  "published": "2026-03-18T18:31:18Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-23268"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0fc63dd9170643d15c25681fca792539e23f4640"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/17debf5586020790b5717f96e5e6a3ca5bb961ab"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/33ee909702e047c94aaf41d4eea35626d509802c"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4cafce4d6d0a66ec27e3af5637c11901d60189fa"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6601e13e82841879406bf9f369032656f441a425"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a407a078cd41b5261b99d822af784bd9f136eb4d"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b60b3f7a35c46b2e0ca934f9c988b8fca06d76c6"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b6a94eeca9c6c8f7c55ad44c62c98324f51ec596"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.qualys.com/2026/03/10/crack-armor.txt"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline

Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC

JSON
How durations are calculated

Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.

Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.

Events included in the timeline

Loading timeline…


    Loading…

    Loading…

    Loading…

    Related by attack behaviour

    Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.