GHSA-8HP2-QMC6-F97H

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-05-01 15:30 – Updated: 2026-05-07 06:31
VLAI?
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

smb: client: validate the whole DACL before rewriting it in cifsacl

build_sec_desc() and id_mode_to_cifs_acl() derive a DACL pointer from a server-supplied dacloffset and then use the incoming ACL to rebuild the chmod/chown security descriptor.

The original fix only checked that the struct smb_acl header fits before reading dacl_ptr->size or dacl_ptr->num_aces. That avoids the immediate header-field OOB read, but the rewrite helpers still walk ACEs based on pdacl->num_aces with no structural validation of the incoming DACL body.

A malicious server can return a truncated DACL that still contains a header, claims one or more ACEs, and then drive replace_sids_and_copy_aces() or set_chmod_dacl() past the validated extent while they compare or copy attacker-controlled ACEs.

Factor the DACL structural checks into validate_dacl(), extend them to validate each ACE against the DACL bounds, and use the shared validator before the chmod/chown rebuild paths. parse_dacl() reuses the same validator so the read-side parser and write-side rewrite paths agree on what constitutes a well-formed incoming DACL.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-31709"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-05-01T14:16:20Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nsmb: client: validate the whole DACL before rewriting it in cifsacl\n\nbuild_sec_desc() and id_mode_to_cifs_acl() derive a DACL pointer from a\nserver-supplied dacloffset and then use the incoming ACL to rebuild the\nchmod/chown security descriptor.\n\nThe original fix only checked that the struct smb_acl header fits before\nreading dacl_ptr-\u003esize or dacl_ptr-\u003enum_aces.  That avoids the immediate\nheader-field OOB read, but the rewrite helpers still walk ACEs based on\npdacl-\u003enum_aces with no structural validation of the incoming DACL body.\n\nA malicious server can return a truncated DACL that still contains a\nheader, claims one or more ACEs, and then drive\nreplace_sids_and_copy_aces() or set_chmod_dacl() past the validated\nextent while they compare or copy attacker-controlled ACEs.\n\nFactor the DACL structural checks into validate_dacl(), extend them to\nvalidate each ACE against the DACL bounds, and use the shared validator\nbefore the chmod/chown rebuild paths.  parse_dacl() reuses the same\nvalidator so the read-side parser and write-side rewrite paths agree on\nwhat constitutes a well-formed incoming DACL.",
  "id": "GHSA-8hp2-qmc6-f97h",
  "modified": "2026-05-07T06:31:40Z",
  "published": "2026-05-01T15:30:33Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-31709"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0a8cf165566ba55a39fd0f4de172119dd646d39a"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b78db9bddc84136f6a0bb49e8883cf200dfb87a8"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d92f3f0b22414e7515696a02224d0af55e3004a3"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…